스쿼시선수들의 코트이용 실태를 통한 만족도에 관한 연구

Abstract

Using the courts for Squash Players with actual conditions Satisfaction Study

Kyoung Hee Lee

Department of Physical Education, The Graduate School, Pukyong National University

Abstract

The research activities in the country through a questionnaire that squash players who use the facilities of the actual conditions and the players are happy about the stadium used to identify the degree of squash players for performance-enhancing and developing the basic materials are intended to provide. Results of this study are as follows.

First, squash courts, using an analysis of actual conditions in all parts seen by the difference, "select the motive and squash courts" for the 'leader' was showed by the most highly, "Years of using the facility," the '4 years' were the most reported high, "one week to use the number of squash courts," which appeared six days were the most highly prize, "often times use facility," the most highly emerged that afternoon, one times the average to spend time looking for the facilities available at the time the average time to time, the '3 hours 'were the highest. Leaders to participate in the training time, less time for the '2 hours' as the highest leaders to participate in one week on the number of training days for the '5' the most popular and the number of squash courts, one for the '3'is the most were higher. Second, we use an analysis of squash courts in all parts that are seen by the difference, performance-enhancing and stress, improves stamina is yes, while the highest appeared, attractive body weight loss and management, and interpersonal relationships' Just so, 'appears in the most highly depends on the said items. Third, squash courts, an analysis of satisfaction with the significant differences are not as clearly appeared that things were different, the frequency of use and time for the courts 'satisfaction' was the most reported high gender, age, affiliation, a significant difference in academic that no national team experience, the award-winning significant difference in the frequency and time using the courts as relevant as the cross appeared, in time for the training of leaders for focusing on the level of 'satisfaction' was the most reported high levels, between groups The difference, gender, national team experience, the difference does not award experience, age and affiliation, education was a significant difference in the training of leaders at the time focused enough to cross the teenager appeared relevant was the training for guards Usually this shows up higher, the difference between groups in gender, age, affiliation, education, water experienced no significant differences, significant differences in experience, the team will interact with relevant training, according to security. Fourth, the squash court facility of selection consideration factors analysis showed that significant differences were found to have, the liver mass showed no significant difference. Facility location (distance) for the 'important' that appeared most highly, as a group showed no difference in the liver was significant both because of the facility location (distance) and there was no mutual relevance. The number of players training for the 'important' that appeared most highly, facilities (amenities, parking space) for the 'important' that appeared most highly, a significant difference between groups with no difference seen by high Director (lead levels), "about the 'important' were the most reported high, significant differences in age and education as a good leader (lead levels), and according to the mutual relevance. Expenses for facilities and about 200,000 won lessons, the most highly arrives, look at the difference between the groups, gender differences do not have the team experience, age, belong, education, award-winning facility that was the difference in Terms and lessons that are relevant according to security and trade. Fifth, an analysis of factors that played a career in the game winning score of times in the 'twice' appeared the most high, look at the difference between the groups, gender, age, affiliation, education, the award is not seen by the significant difference , team experience, as a significant difference in the fight standing and mutually relevant records showed. Last year, the above results for the 'third' were the highest. ' quarterfinals', 'Runners', 'winner', 'semifinals' appeared. According to the differences between groups, age and affiliation, education is not a significant difference, gender, national team experience, the award was a significant difference in the game with a winning record, and according to mutually relevant.