실태조사를 통한 대학 강의평가 개선 방향 연구

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine how university students did course evaluation (participation in classes, the sincerity about class's goal, appropriateness of instructional methods, understanding of teaching, the effect of teaching, assignments and tests, satisfaction) according to liberal arts/major , theory/practice, original lecture, class size,obtained grades and grade. Number of course evaluation is 93,739 and number of corse is 2,697 participated in the study in Pukyong National University. The Scales for Course Evaluation was used as an instrument for the study. The conclusions obtained as following.

1) The assessment will be done to get a feedback a time during the semester. For the sake of a lecture improvement, I propose a assessment during the semester.

2) It is more important composition of the question than functionality.

3) Each College has not the similar score of lecture assessment. Because it has some circumstances and speciality of its own . So What standardize the score is completely reasonable for the gap.

4) The number of students has represented the different score. It is proper that we should give + grade in the huge lecture more than 70 people and - grade In the small lecture less than 19

5) The case of the first grade, it has more different then second-year class to the fifth-grade class. So It is proper that we should give + grade to the first grade.

6) Because It is different from the Grade and credit for a course, a stingy subject about score is given to a unfavorable score. so it is rational that the result of students that get c or d grade is excepted. And the case of conferring P/F score, it is adequate that a lecture assessment of individual professor is excepted.