The comparison of change detection methods in remote sensing
- Alternative Title
- 변화탐지기법의 비교 연구
- Abstract
- Recently, It is issues the master plan about land-monitoring system construction. The land monitoring support to making decision efficiently, and to management resources. The change detection technology is good to detection changed area using satellite images for land monitoring.
There are some summary researches of various change detection methods about strength and weakness already. But they didn't worked verification process by test area.
In this study, to verify what is the best of change detection methods in remote sensing, Through to compare the change detection results using Landsat 7 ETM+ images. In accuracy assessment process, the kappa coefficient is estimated by comparison relative with each change detection methods. It is different origin computing method of kappa coefficient.
The results shows the image ratioing by NDVI method is the best to detect changed area. And the image differencing by PCA method is good to detect changed area. Additional the image differencing by tasseled cap is very similar to the image differencing by principal component analysis method.
- Author(s)
- 김태우
- Issued Date
- 2009
- Awarded Date
- 2009. 2
- Type
- Dissertation
- Keyword
- Change detection Landsat ETM Comparison
- Publisher
- 부경대학교 대학원
- URI
- https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/10614
http://pknu.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000001954753
- Alternative Author(s)
- Kim, Tae-Woo
- Affiliation
- 부경대학교 대학원
- Department
- 대학원 위성정보과학과
- Advisor
- 서용철
- Table Of Contents
- Ⅰ. Introduction = 1
1. Background = 1
2. Study objectives = 8
3. An overview = 8
Ⅱ. Implementation = 11
1. Data pre-processing = 11
1.1. Digital elevation model = 13
1.2. Geometric correction = 14
1.3. Radiometric rectification = 24
2. Change detection methods = 37
2.1. Image differencing = 43
2.2. Image ratioing = 44
2.3. Normalized difference vegetation index = 46
2.4. Normalized difference built-up index = 47
2.5. Principal component analysis = 49
2.6. Tasseled Cap Transformation = 59
2.7. Unsupervised classification = 62
Ⅲ. Results and Conclusion = 69
1. The change detection results = 69
1.1. Threshold value = 69
1.2. Accuracy assessment = 71
2. Conclusion = 82
Ⅳ. Summary and recommedation = 85
- Degree
- Master
-
Appears in Collections:
- 대학원 > 위성정보과학과
- Authorize & License
-
- Files in This Item:
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.