PUKYONG

아파트 발코니 확장에 대한 사용자 인식특성에 관한 연구

Metadata Downloads
Alternative Title
A study on Residents' Perceptions Characteristics about Balcony Remodeling in Apartment
Abstract
A fast-growing population in the city and the government policy aimed at increasing the housing supply for enhancing the people’s living standard has resulted in creating the apartment as a typical housing model in our nation. However, the policy focusing on enhancing the land use efficiency or economic efficiency failed to satisfy the user’s needs in terms of housing quality. In line with improved living standard, the resident’s needs for expanding the substantial living space and the balcony in a bid to maximize the space have been increasingly growing, and consequently, balcony expansion has been legalized, beginning in January 2006. Though the expanding the balcony provides the residents with the benefit of upgrading the living standard, it also has brought about some problems. But the builders, instead of letting the users know about the potential problems, rather require the users to mandatorily accept the expansion for the sake of their convenience only.
The study was intended to investigate the status of expansion of balcony in a tower-type and plank-type apartment building, and the status of the residents living on an expanded balcony and non-expanded balcony to identify whether or not the expansion met resident’s needs, and finally, after identifying the problems associated with the balcony expansion, a comparison and analysis with the existing balcony were conducted.
Through the face-to-face interview, the survey of user’s satisfaction level on entire balcony and the details thereof was conducted. And as a result, the level of satisfaction appeared to be highest with the balcony expansion on a plank-type apartment building, while the tower-type indicated the lowest level. Particularly, when it comes to the tower-type, those satisfying or dissatisfying appeared to be significant. While the space, daylight or view from the window were generally acceptable, others such as the temperature in winter, size of balcony, performance and drainage noise were not acceptable, but caused more complains than other cases.
When asked about the need of balcony, 75% responded positively, and when analyzing the response by type, 81.82% of the users answered acknowledging the need of expansion at tower apartment, though they are living without the balcony. And when asked if they were willing to expand the balcony, 73% of the respondents answered they wanted balcony expansion or partial expansion. In case of tower type, the number of rooms was reduced, while the plank type wanted to expand to the living room.
In the wake of surveying the awareness of the problems associated with the balcony expansion, 76.47% of people living on a non-expanded at the plank type answered they knew about the problem, while 54.54% and 51.51%, respectively, of those on an expanded balcony atthe tower type and plank type answered yes, indicating around the half were aware of the problems. They said they have heard mostly through the mass media, neighbors or friends.
As a result of reexamination of the status on balcony expansion after letting them know about the problems found through the existing studies, 73% who wanted the expansion or partial expansion was reduced to 59% and in case of tower type apartment building, 87.88% of those who wanted a full-scale expansion was changed to partial expansion or non-expansion. The number of rooms found as a result of previous survey was reduced to 33.12%, which indicated many changed their mind not to expand after hearing about the problems.
The survey of the balcony expansion has brought about the conclusion as follows.
First, when it comes to the need for expanding the balcony, the need for expanding the balcony at the tower type and by the spouse appeared to be high. That is, they were in need of the space that functions the balcony.
Second, in the process of housing procurement in the future, the builders are needed to explain the potential problems to the users for their determination.
Third, the type of balcony which the users wish to have shall be identified to provide the users with a broad range of options, and the builders shall seek the measure to deal with the problems resulting from the balcony expansion.
As a result of reviewing and comparing the balcony expansion at the tower type and plank type apartment, users’ satisfaction and problems with the balcony use and expansion could be identified. Further efforts to examine and improve the problems are expected to make commitment to providing a better balcony space in the coming days.
Author(s)
박소희
Issued Date
2008
Awarded Date
2008. 2
Type
Dissertation
Keyword
발코니 아파트 거주자 사용자 인식특성
Publisher
부경대학교 산업대학원
URI
https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/11657
http://pknu.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000001984328
Alternative Author(s)
Park, So-Hee
Affiliation
부경대학교 산업대학원
Department
산업대학원 건축학과
Advisor
홍성민
Table Of Contents
I. 서론 = 1
1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
1.2 연구 범위 및 방법 = 3
Ⅱ. 발코니 및 아파트 발코니의 일반적 사항 = 4
2.1 발코니의 정의 및 개념 = 4
2.2 발코니의 역할 및 기능 = 6
2.3 아파트 발코니와 아파트실과의 관계 = 7
2.4 국내 아파트 발코니 계획과 관계 법령의 변화 = 9
2.5 국내 아파트 공급정책에 대한 고찰 = 14
2.5.1 현행 아파트의 공급정책 = 14
2.5.2 아파트 공급정책에 따른 발코니의 실태 = 16
Ⅲ. 발코니 관련 선행연구 동향 분석 = 19
3.1 조사대상범위 설정 및 유효 데이터 선별 = 19
3.2 발코니 확장에 관한 선행 연구 현황 = 23
3.2.1 선행연구의 분야별 현황 = 23
3.2.2 선행연구의 분야 및 연도별 현황 = 24
3.3 발코니 확장에 관한 분야별 세부 연구 현황 = 26
3.3.1 성능 = 26
3.3.2 기능분석 = 29
3.3.3 방재 = 30
3.3.4 차음 = 32
3.3.5 사용자 인식 = 33
3.4 소결 = 34
Ⅳ. 신축 아파트의 발코니 확장에 대한 사용자 인식 특성 = 35
4.1 조사 개요 = 35
4.2 조사대상자의 일반적 특성 = 38
4.3 발코니 확장에 대한 거주자 만족도 분석 = 41
4.3.1 아파트 평면에 대한 만족도 = 41
4.3.2 발코니 이용형태에 관한 만족도 = 42
4.4 발코니 공간의 필요여부 및 역할 = 45
4.4.1 발코니 공간의 필요여부 = 45
4.4.2 발코니 공간의 역할 = 46
4.5 발코니 확장여부 및 선호 형태 = 48
4.5.1 발코니를 확장한 실의 형태 = 48
4.5.2 차후 발코니 확장 여부 = 51
4.5.3 차후 발코니 확장 여부에 따른 이유 = 53
4.5.4 발코니 확장 선호 형태 = 56
4.6 발코니 확장의 문제점 인식 특성 = 59
4.6.1 발코니 확장의 문제점 인식 여부 = 59
4.6.2 발코니 확장의 문제점 인식 후 확장 여부 = 62
4.6.3 문제점 인식 후 확장 여부에 따른 이유 = 65
4.6.4 문제점 인식 후 확장 선호 형태 = 66
4.7 발코니 확장의 계획 방향 제안 = 70
Ⅴ. 결론 = 73
참고문헌 = 75
Abstract = 77
부록 = 79
Degree
Master
Appears in Collections:
산업대학원 > 건축학과
Authorize & License
  • Authorize공개
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.