직장 내 무례 경험이 직장 내 무례 가해와 반생산적 과업 행동에 미치는 영향
- Alternative Title
- The Effects of Experienced Workplace Incivility on the Instigated Workplace Incivility and Counterproductive Work Behaviors : The Moderating Effect of Role Stressors
- Abstract
- According to the results of various domestic and foreign surveys, 'workplace incivility' has reached a dangerous level, and the situation continues to deteriorate. Such incivility in the workplace is known to have a negative impact on individuals and incur significant costs for organizations as well.
Since Andersson and Pearson (1999) introduced workplace incivility for the first time in the field of business administration, it has received constant attention from numerous researchers over the past 20 years. However, prior studies have focused on the consequences rather than the antecedents of workplace incivility, confined the source of incivility to the internal (organization), and neglected the spiraling effect of workplace incivility which a person who experiences incivility becomes a incivility instigator again.
Therefore, this study aims to examine the impact of workplace incivility experiences on workplace incivility instigation (organizational incivility, incivility against customer) and counterproductive work behavior (negative megaphoning, service sabotage).
In addition, this study examines the moderating effects of three role stressors (role ambiguity, role conflict, and role overload) on the relationship between incivility experiences and incivility instigation, and counterproductive work behavior.
Specifically, I propose the following hypotheses.
Hypothesis 1. Experience of workplace incivility positively relates to instigation of workplace incivility.
Hypothesis 2. Experience of workplace incivility positively relates to counterproductive work behavior.
Hypothesis 3. Role stressors positively moderates the relationship between experience of workplace incivility and instigation of workplace incivility.
Hypothesis 4. Role stressors positively moderates the relationship between experience of workplace incivility and counterproductive work behavior.
In order to empirically test these hypotheses, I collected data from car salespeople, who account for most of car sales, and face-to-face contact and communication with customers, take more important roles than other service industry workers.
The hierarchical regression analysis results of a sample of 319 car salespeople support the hypotheses. And I provide academic and practical implications, and also present suggestions for future research.
- Author(s)
- 정지선
- Issued Date
- 2021
- Awarded Date
- 2021. 8
- Type
- Dissertation
- Keyword
- 직장 내 무례 경험 직장 내 무례 가해 반생산적 과업 행동 역할 스트레스원
- Publisher
- 부경대학교
- URI
- https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/1264
http://pknu.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=200000508764
- Alternative Author(s)
- Ji Sun Jung
- Affiliation
- 부경대학교 대학원
- Department
- 대학원 경영컨설팅협동과정
- Advisor
- 배준영
- Table Of Contents
- Ⅰ. 서론 1
1. 연구의 배경 1
2. 연구의 목적 3
Ⅱ. 기존 문헌 검토 5
1. 직장 내 무례 5
가. 직장 내 무례의 정의 5
나. 직장 내 무례의 유형 9
다. 직장 내 무례의 비용 11
라. 직장 내 무례에 관한 국내연구 12
마. 직장 내 무례에 관한 해외연구 17
2. 반생산적 과업 행동 20
가. 부정적인 메가포닝 22
나. 서비스 사보타주 24
3. 역할 스트레스와 역할 스트레스원 26
가. 역할 모호성 26
나. 역할 갈등 27
다. 역할 과부하 28
Ⅲ. 이론적 배경 29
1. 정서 사건이론 29
2. 사회교환이론 32
3. 대상 유사성 모델과 파급효과 35
4. 반생산적 과업 행동의 스트레스원-정서 모델 38
Ⅳ. 가설 설정과 연구모형 40
1. 직장 내 무례 경험과 직장 내 무례 가해 간의 관계 (가설 1) 40
2. 직장 내 무례 경험과 반생산적 과업 행동 간의 관계 (가설 2) 45
3. 역할 스트레스원의 조절효과 (가설 3, 4) 53
4. 연구모형 57
Ⅴ. 연구 방법 58
1. 표본과 자료 수집 58
2. 변수와 측정 62
가. 종속변수 62
나. 독립변수 63
다. 조절변수 64
라. 통제변수 64
3. 실증분석 방법 66
4. 신뢰성과 타당성 검정 67
5. 무응답 편의 검정 69
6. 동일방법 편의 검정 70
7. 기술통계 및 상관관계 분석 71
Ⅵ. 실증분석 결과 73
1. 가설 1과 가설 3, 4의 검정 결과 73
2. 가설 2와 가설 3, 4의 검정 결과 84
Ⅶ. 결론 91
1. 실증분석 결과의 요약 91
2. 연구의 학문적 시사점 93
3. 연구의 실무적 시사점 95
4. 연구의 한계점 98
5. 향후 연구 방향 100
참고문헌 102
설문지 131
- Degree
- Doctor
-
Appears in Collections:
- 대학원 > 경영컨설팅협동과정
- Authorize & License
-
- Files in This Item:
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.