PUKYONG

사회연결망을 이용한 귀금속 무역 네트워크에 관한 연구

Metadata Downloads
Alternative Title
A Study on Precious Metals Trade Networks by Utilizing Social Network Analysis : Focusing on import and exports from China at the point of entry into force of Korea-China FTA
Abstract
In this study we plunged into infinite competition reflect through a Free Trade Agreement the complexity of the structure of world trade flows and precious metals trading network HS 71(Precious metals), analyzed the trade structure of the HS 7113(Jewelery and its parts), HS7114(Gold jewelery products, its parts, silversmith).
Current trading has evolved into a more complex networks due to Free Trade Agreements, analysis of published studies increased to larger groups, due to the scope of the agreement involvement it was difficult to identify and analyze the hidden trade structure.
For a country such as Korea lacking in natural resources situation is not forced to rely on imports for much of the raw material, as it exports raw materials and imports by creating high added value by processing them on the basis of superior technology FTA provides a lot of opportunities and risks.
In 2015, January 20 China and Korea FTA enters into force and just in 11 days of 2016 January 1 tariff reduction measures were made. Now before expecting actual profit of FTA South Korea-China of the precious metal ahead of trade throughout the world, we analyze the flow of the precious metal trading network of the destination country, by measuring the mutual influence between countries and partners around the center that seeks to provide the basic data of various studies on cross-border transactions.
In addition comparing the concessions and rules of origin of import and export trends between Korea-China and South Korea-China FTA, the center was conducted and analyzed cohesive group structure as an indicator of social network analysis, sorting through the aggregation structure analysis did not show a high growth potential in the country and the centrality analysis was to determine the position of China and Korea.
Central density analysis showed the relationship between the national trade network (Density), the development potential and competitiveness, which implies a degree of centrality of trade connection (Degree Centrality), the fastest instantaneous adaptability harmonize with the international environment and in contrast to the central trade close (Closeness Centrality), centrality through an intermediary (Betweenness) represents the control of trade flows analyzed the influence of the central station and the neighboring countries.
The Closeness centrality of export trade in India, Germany, United Kingdom of 2003, changed in 2014 to China, Germany, Thailand. Centrality Closeness of import trade in China, US, France, 2003 were changed in 2014 to China, US and India. The central mediated(Betweenness) of export trade of US, Germany, UK in 2003 changed in 2014 to the order of US, Switzerland, China. The centrality mediated(Betweenness) of import trade were US, Germany, UK in 2003 and were changed 2014 to US, Italy, Canada.
In 2003 connection of the export trade flow is about the centrality of HS 71(Pearls, precious stones, semi-precious stones, precious metals and their products, Imitation jewelery, coins) were United States, Belgium, United Kingdom, and in 2014, its influence was graded as Switzerland, Hong Kong, USA, China were in order, in 2003 connection of the degree centrality of import trade in Switzerland, Belgium, India changed in 2014 into Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, India and China.
HS 71 type (Pearls, precious stones, semi-precious stones, precious metals and their products, Imitation jewelery, coins) in 2003 connection degree centrality of export trade in the United States, Belgium, Britain has been gradually changing into Switzerland, Hong Kong, USA, China in 2014. Degree of connection centrality of the import trade was changed in 2003 Switzerland, Belgium to India, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, India and China in 2014.
Closeness centrality of export trade was found in India, Germany and the United Kingdom in 2003, to China, Germany, Thailand, 2014. Closeness centrality of trading income were changing in 2003 China, the US, France, to the China, United States, India. Export trade centrality parameter(Betweenness) was changed in 2003 to the United States, Germany, England, to USA, Switzerland, China in 2014 and import trade centrality parameter(Betweenness) has changed in the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom of 2003 to the United States, Italy and Canada in 2014.
HS 7113 (jewelery and its parts; made of precious metals or be limited to those made of metal clad with precious metal) connection degree centrality of export trade in Italy, USA, Switzerland, 2003, later due to influence of China it changed to China, India, United Arab Emirates in 2014. Import trade connection degree centrality in 2003 were on China, Italy, India and then changed to China, India, France in 2014.
Closeness centrality of export trade in 2003 were Italy, Germany France and changed to Thailand, Italy, Germany in 2014. Income trading close centrality appeared in the United States, Italy, China in 2003, later transformed to China, the United States, Italy in 2014. Export trade centrality parameter was only a slight change in ranking in the United States, Italy, France in 2003 and later to 2014 the United States, France, Italy.Import trade centrality parameter has changed in the United States, Germany, Italy, 2003, to the United States, Italy, Hong Kong in 2014.
HS 7114 (gold jewelery, silver jewelery and its parts; made of precious metals or be limited to those made of metal clad with precious metal) export trade links about the centrality of the year was the increased due to influence of China in Singapore, Italy, Switzerland in 2003 and in 2014 to China, the United Arab Emirates, Italy. Import trade connection degree centrality was changed in 2003, Indonesia, Italy, China to Japan, Italy and China in 2014. Closeness centrality of export trade was found in Italy, Germany and the United States in 2003 and it turned to appear in France, Italy, Denmark in 2014. Income trading closeness centrality appeared in 2003 in Italy, the US, China, then in China, US, Italy, in 2014. Export trade centrality parameter was changed in 2003, the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom was changed in the United States, France, Denmark, in 2014. Imports mediated(Betweenness) trade centrality were in Italy, USA, Germany in 2003 until it changed in 2014 to the United States, Italy and France.
HS 71, 7113, 7114 were taken together the precious metals trading network connection degree, closeness, but the trend of decline in the centrality parameter(Betweenness) if the rank of the country high like China. China has been able to show that was placed in the top group, because China is located in the center of the world's precious metals trading network, by maintaining a close trade relationship with many countries, and it was found that a it is very influential increased by maximizing the efficiency of the trade.
In this study, import and export statistics provided by the FTA and the Korea International Trade Association statistics provided by the Customs Service, between countries were using the import and export statistics provided by the UNcometrade.
Author(s)
이경민
Issued Date
2016
Awarded Date
2016. 8
Type
Dissertation
Keyword
FTA 무역 네트워크 사회연결망분석 귀금속 중심성 응집그룹 주얼리
Publisher
부경대학교 대학원
URI
https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/13339
http://pknu.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000002299480
Alternative Author(s)
LeeKyungmin
Affiliation
부경대학교 대학원
Department
대학원 국제통상물류학과
Advisor
이춘수
Table Of Contents
제1장 서론 1
제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
1.1.1 귀금속 무역 네트워크 연구의 배경 1
1.1.2 귀금속 무역 네트워크 연구의 목적 2
제2절 연구의 구성 및 방법 3
제2장 이론적 배경 및 문헌연구 4
제1절 세계 귀금속 무역 4
제2절 우리나라 FTA 현황 6
제3절 귀금속 무역과 FTA 7
2.3.1 귀금속 품목분류(HS Code) 7
2.3.2 HS 71, 7113, 7114 수․출입 동향 9
2.3.3 양허와 원산지 기준 15
제4절 수출입 통관 19
제5절 한․중 FTA 20
제6절 귀금속 무역 및 사회연결망 분석 문헌연구 24
제3장 분석 방법 및 사회연결망 분석 27
제1절 분석방법 27
제2절 귀금속 무역의 중심성 분석 29
3.2.1 연결정도(degree) 중심성 분석 29
3.2.1.1 귀금속 수출 네트워크의 연결정도(degree) 중심성 분석 31
3.2.1.2 귀금속 수입 네트워크의 연결정도(degree) 중심성 분석 41
3.2.2 근접(closeness) 중심성 분석 51
3.2.2.1 귀금속 수출 네트워크의 근접(closeness) 중심성 분석 51
3.2.2.2 귀금속 수입 네트워크의 근접(closeness) 중심성 분석 55
3.2.3 매개(betweeness) 중심성 분석 58
3.2.3.1 귀금속 수출 네트워크의 매개(betweeness) 중심성 분석 59
3.2.3.2 귀금속 수입 네트워크의 매개(betweeness) 중심성 분석 63
제3절 귀금속 무역의 응집그룹 분석 66
3.3.1 귀금속 수출 응집그룹 분석 67
3.3.2 귀금속 수입 응집그룹 분석 89
제4장 결론 및 시사점 114
제1절 연구의 요약 및 결론 114
제2절 연구의 의의 및 시사점 117
제3절 연구의 한계 및 향후 연구방향 118
참고문헌 120
부록 123
Degree
Master
Appears in Collections:
대학원 > 국제통상물류학과-FTA비즈니스전공
Authorize & License
  • Authorize공개
Files in This Item:
  • There are no files associated with this item.

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.