PUKYONG

유아 창의성 교육을 위한 블렌디드 액션러닝 기반 교사교육에 참여한 교사의 경험

Metadata Downloads
Alternative Title
A Study on the Experiences of Teachers in Blended Action Learning-Based Teacher Training for Early Childhood Creativity Education
Abstract
This study tried to explore the experiences of six teachers in the process of organizing and progressing the blended action learning (BAL)-based teacher training for early childhood creativity education (ECCE). The purpose of the study is to show a practical example of the BAL-based teacher training for ECCE, by introducing the subject of creativity education and applying the BAL as a method of teacher training.

In order to accomplish research purpose, two research questions were made, as follows:
First, how to organize the BAL-based teacher training program?
Second, what were teacher’s experiences as participants of the BAL-based teacher training for ECCE?

In order to answer these questions, first of all, the teacher education program was constructed from examining precedent studies about creativity, early childhood creativity, teacher training for creativity, action learning, blended learning, and blended action learning and extracting implications. First to forth sessions, in detail, were designed for helping teachers appreciate the question concerning the ECCE through simple lectures, questions and discussion, or sharing of experiences regarding the education and teaching methods about creativity and early childhood creativity. In following fourth to tenth sessions, the programs, based on the BAL, were organized to make the participants learn by a process of rotated and repeated courses, which configured with clarification of the problems and deduction of the solutions, scheme and action for field application, and reflection and assessment about ECCE. The teacher training was proceeded offline for 2~3 hours at fortnightly, and online café system was used as a supplementary source for insufficient learning activity and data in offline program. In other words, the participants could discuss the solution of the practical question about the ECCE, give each other feedback on their own solution, and share the reflection of experiences they had after practical application in online café system. There were overall 10 sessions, and the program was operated after workday during the semester.
Second, the BAL-base teacher training for ECCE, which was designed in this research study, was applied to 6 teachers from child care center and kindergarten who interested in ECCE (April 2017 to July 2017). For analyzing the experiences of the teachers participated in BAL-based the teacher training for ECCE, qualitative analysis, which inductively derives the subject from depth coding process after segmenting and open coding by collecting the text data: recordings, individual interviews, reflection journals, and activity proposals of the participants in the training, and reading the data and transcripts, was used.
The 6 teachers showed development by getting the common subject, creativity, extending the understanding of creativity with conversation and discussion, and practicing and reflecting the ECCE in the field. First, the teachers closed the distance on creativity in “meeting the creativity”, starting from the voluntary interest and demand in creativity, reflecting their own perception of it, and grasping the various perspective of sundry scholars about it. Also, the extension of understanding creativity made teachers discover creativities of early childhood they didn’t beforetime and review their classes. Second, “learning the creativity” gave the participant the experiences of identifying the fresh-looking materials in classroom, taking lessons from conversation with other teachers, and studying with researchers via the extended understanding of creativity. Third, the teachers, in “practicing the creativity education”, tried to connect the theory and practice and overcome the difficulties in process of it. In addition, they could revise the curriculum of ECCE and challenge new teaching methods. Finally, in “practicing, reflecting, and developing”, the repetitive process in the BAL-based the teacher training for ECCE of the reflecting their teaching, analyzing the cause of failure together, and searching and practicing the solution inspired the teachers with confidence in their ECCE. Moreover, those were the process of becoming teachers, who consistently consider and practice the ECCE, and growing together.
This study organized the BAL-based the teacher training for ECCE and introduced the process of learning the subject of creativity together, practicing the ECCE in field, and reflecting the education. The teachers participated in this research study could reconcile theory and practice for ECCE, recognize the role of teacher, and experiencing change and growth during the reflection and practice.
Therefore, this study have thematic and methodological meaning in regard to introducing the subject of ECCE to the teacher education and applying the BAL to the method of the education.
Author(s)
김빛내
Issued Date
2018
Awarded Date
2018.2
Type
Dissertation
Publisher
부경대학교
URI
https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/14146
http://pknu.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000010855
Alternative Author(s)
Kim, Bit Nae
Affiliation
부경대학교 대학원
Department
대학원 유아교육학과
Advisor
황희숙
Table Of Contents
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론 1
1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
2. 연구문제 8
3. 용어의 정의 9
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 10
1. 창의성 10
가. 창의성의 정의 10
나. 창의성의 구성요소 15
2. 창의성 교육 18
가. 유아 창의성 교육 18
나. 유아 창의성 교육을 위한 교사 역할 20
3. 블렌디드 액션러닝 24
가. 액션러닝 24
나. 블렌디드 액션러닝 30
다. 블렌디드 액션러닝의 과정 34
라. 블렌디드 액션러닝과 교사교육 37
Ⅲ. 유아 창의성 교육을 위한 블렌디드 액션러닝 기반 교사교육 구성 40
1. 유아 창의성 교육을 위한 BAL 기반 교사교육의 목적 및 목표 40
2. 유아 창의성 교육을 위한 BAL 기반 교사교육의 내용 44
3. 교사교육의 방법으로서 BAL의 적용 48
4. 유아 창의성 교육을 위한 BAL 기반 교사교육 구성 53
Ⅳ. 연구방법 62
1. 연구자 63
2. 연구 참여자 64
3. 유아 창의성 교육을 위한 BAL 기반 교사교육의 적용 69
4. 자료 수집 및 분석 73
가. 자료수집 74
나. 자료분석 77
다. 자료의 타당성 및 신뢰성 79
5. 윤리적 고려 80
Ⅴ. 유아 창의성 교육을 위한 블렌디드 액션러닝 기반 교사교육에 참여한 교사의 경험 81
1. 창의성을 만나다 81
가. 우리의 요구와 관심에서 출발하다 81
나. 창의성에 대해 함께 이야기하다 87
다. 창의성과의 거리감을 좁혀나가다 94
라. 아이들에게서 창의성을 발견하다 102
마. 나의 수업을 돌아보다 109
2. 창의성을 알아가다 117
가. 알게 되니 보이다 117
나. 대화하며 배우다 121
다. 연구자와 함께하다 123
3. 창의성 교육을 실천하다 126
가. 앎과 실천을 연결하다 126
나. 창의성 교육에서의 어려움을 극복하다 131
다. 창의성 수업을 함께 고민하다 140
라. 교육과정을 다시 보다 145
마. 새로운 수업에 도전하다 149
4. 실천하고 성찰하며 성장하다 153
가. 교사로서의 나를 되돌아보다 153
나. 창의성 수업에 자신감이 생기다 161
다. 실천하는 교사가 되어가다 164
라. 함께 성장하다 169
Ⅵ. 논의 및 결론 174
1. 요약 및 논의 174
2. 결론 및 제언 187
참고문헌 191
부 록 208
1. 연구 설명서 208
2. 연구 동의서 211
Degree
Doctor
Appears in Collections:
대학원 > 유아교육학과
Authorize & License
  • Authorize공개
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.