The Relationship of Leisure Travel Motivation,Constraint and Constraint Management
- Abstract
- This research, composed of three (experimental, pilot, main) studies, is constructed to investigate the relationship of leisure travel motivation, constraint, and constraint
management. The experimental study suggests the pleasure travel constraint management process models through a questionnaire survey, and interviews. Two
hundred and twelve South Korean university students participated in the survey, and forty two South Koreans (aged between 19 and 84 years old) participated in the
interview. The pleasure travel constraint management process I model presents two types of constraints: (1) serious constraints which cannot be overcome and lead to no leisure activity participation, and (2) negotiable constraints, which can be overcome and lead to either travelling or alternative leisure activities. The pleasure travel
constraint management process II model demonstrates three types of constraint haves: serious constraint haves, negotiable constraint haves, and no constraint haves. No
constraint haves travel, and negotiable constraint haves participate in travelling or alternative leisure activities, while serious constraint haves fail to participate in leisure activities.
The pilot study, participated by 24 interviewees, presents the results from the open, axial, selective coding of the grounded theory. Open coding proposes three groups:
travel desire haves without travel constraints, travel desire haves with constraints and travel desire have-nots with constraints. Axial coding suggests four groups: no constraint haves with travel desire, no constraint haves without travel desire, constraint haves with travel desire, and constraint haves without travel desire. Selective coding discovers two groups: travelers with a desire to travel and nontravelers without a desire to travel, indicating the importance of desire in travelling.
The main study is to examine the relationship of park visit motivation, constraint, and constraint management. The questionnaire survey, which was completed by 431 park visitors, presents that (1) park visit motivations play a direct positive role in park visits and also in the constraint management strategies use; (2) park visit constraints
play a direct negative role in park visits; and (3) constraint management strategies play a direct positive role in park visits.
- Issued Date
- 2014
- Awarded Date
- 2014. 2
- Type
- Dissertation
- Publisher
- 국립부경대학교
- Affiliation
- The Graduate School
- Department
- 대학원 경영학과
- Advisor
- 전재균
- Table Of Contents
- LIST OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
1. Research Background ----------------------------------------------------1
2. Research Objectives ------------------------------------------------------5
3. Research Structure -------------------------------------------------------6
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
1 Leisure Activity Motivations --------------------------------------------7
1.1 Travel Motivations
1.2 Common Travel Motivations
1.3 Travel Motivation Categorization
1.4 Park Visit Motivation
2 Leisure Activity Constraints -------------------------------------------13
2.1 Leisure Activity Constraints
2.2 Common Leisure Activity Constraints
2.3 Leisure Activity Constraint Models
3 Leisure Activity Constraint Management --------------------------20
3.1 Leisure Activity Constraint Management Studies
3.2 Leisure Activity Constraint Management Strategies
3.3 Leisure Activity Constraint Management Common Strategies
3.4 Jackson et al.'s Balance Proposition
3.5 Hubbard & Mannell's Constraint Negotiation Testing
3.6 Son et al.'s Constraint Negotiation Testing
3.7 Leisure Activity Constraint Management Testing
III. METHODOLOGY
1. Research Methods --------------------------------------------------------37
2 Quantitative Research --------------------------------------------------38
2.1 Quantitative Method
2.2 Questionnaire Survey
2.3 Questionnaire Survey Sampling
2.4 Questionnaire Survey Data Analysis
3 Qualitative Research ----------------------------------------------------43
3.1 Qualitative Method
3.2 Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis
3.3 Qualitative Studies
IV. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
1 Introduction ---------------------------------------------------------------46
2 Theoretical Framework ------------------------------------------------46
3 Survey ----------------------------------------------------------------------49
4 Interview -------------------------------------------------------------------54
5 Conclusion -----------------------------------------------------------------58
V. PILOT STUDY
1 Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------63
2 Interview --------------------------------------------------------------------65
3 Data Analysis --------------------------------------------------------------66
4 Results ----------------------------------------------------------------------68
5 Conclusion -----------------------------------------------------------------75
VI MIAN RESEARCH
1 Research Hypotheses ----------------------------------------------------76
1.1 Positive Motivation Role
1.2 Negative Constraint Role
1.3 Constraint Management Role
2 Research Method ---------------------------------------------------------80
2.1 Questionnaire Survey
2.2 Questionnaire Items
2.3 Data Collection
3 Data Analysis and Results ----------------------------------------------85
3.1 Participants
3.2 Reliability and Validity Test Results
3.3 Hypotheses Test Results
4 Discussion ------------------------------------------------------------------98
4.1 Motivations in the Constraint Management Process
4.2 Constraints in the Constraint Management Process
5 Conclusion ---------------------------------------------------------------103
5.1 The Summary of the Research
5.2 Contribution, Limitation, Recommendations
REFERENCES -----------------------------------------------------------------------------105
APPENDIXES: Questionnaire ------------------------------------------------------------129
- Degree
- Doctor
- Files in This Item:
-
-
There are no files associated with this item.
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.