지역간 국제교류의 유효선과 한계에 관한 연구

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness and limitation of international exchange through the case between Busan and Fukuoka. This study is conducted through the measurement in quantitative changes of exchange network and an analysis in the economic structure of them. To be specific, this study focused on these aspects; an exchange by governmental agents, an exchange by nonprofit organizations, an exchange by economic agents, and it examines increases and decreases of each type. And this study analyzes the differences of the economic structures of the cities with the Principal Component Analysis based on statistical information. As a result, this study has come to the conclusions. Firstly, each type of exchange has shown the quantitative growth. Since the administrative agreement made in 1989, the exchange between two cities has increased. Furthermore, the exchange has changed in the type of international network through this quantitative growth. Accordingly, there is the effectiveness of quantitative growth in the cities based on the will in the exchange. Secondly, the qualitative growth of the exchange is not satisfactory compared with its quantitative growth. They have achieved the quantitative growth with human exchanges. However, they have not investigated each other enough to establish the Megalopolis proceeding with difficulty, which means the limitation that the qualitative growth was insufficient to the cities. Thirdly, it is thought that the main agents of trade cooperation need to change. It is difficult for the cities to prompt the trade 'cooperation' due to their economic structure; especially the secondary industry field, they are not complementary to each other. Therefore It is not the metropolitan council but primary local governments that prompt the trade 'exchange.' Finally, they need to establish the concrete purposes in the international exchange. The cities' exchange has not accompanied sufficient qualitative growth. This is because it is probably prompted with a mere show for accumulating achievements. Hence, it is required that the aim of the international exchange should be set and qualitative growth of it.