PUKYONG

태권도 품새 경기의 객관적 평가를 위한 채점척도지 개발연구

Metadata Downloads
Alternative Title
Development research of a list of mark for an objective evaluation of Taekwondo Poomsae match
Abstract
Abstract

This study was purposed to develop a scoring scale index for the objective evaluation of Poomsae match for Taekwondo and was performed to objectify the part where referee's subjectivity was often involved and the comprehensive part of the scoring scale index. Before the development of the scoring scale index, a survey for the satisfaction of the existing scoring scale index was firstly performed and this study was performed after checking the necessity of the scoring scale index as a result of survey.
After the development of scoring scale index, this study compared and analyzed between the exiting scoring scale index and new scoring scale index to verify the validity of the objective scoring scale index, and the results comparing and analyzing between the existing scoring scale index and new scoring scale index, satisfactory of scoring items and the development of scoring scale index are as follows:

1. Satisfactory degree of scoring items in the Poomsae match
As a result of questionnaire about the question, 'Are you satisfactory with the scoring method of Poomsae match?, it was appeared that Very Satisfactory; 4.84%, Satisfactory; 35.48%, Common ; 40.32%, Unsatisfactory; 16.13% respectively but Very Dissatisfactory appeared as 3.23%.
As a result of questionnaire about the question, 'Are you satisfactory with the composition of the existing scoring scale index?, it was appeared that Very Satisfactory; 11.29%, Satisfactory; 58.06%, Common; 25.81%, Unsatisfactory; 4.83% respectively but Very Unsatisfactory did not appear.
As a result of questionnaire about question, 'Do you think that the scoring composition to give a more precise discrimination capacity to the configuration and score allocation of the accuracy for a fair determination is necessary?, it was appeared tha Necessarily Necessary; 9.68%, Necessary; 43.55%, Common; 35.48%, Not Necessary: 11.29% respectively but Never Necessary did not appear.
As a result of questionnaire about question, 'Do you think that the scoring composition to give a more precise discrimination capacity to the configuration and score allocation of the accuracy of the first item (expressing technical characteristics of motion) of the skill part for a fair determination is necessary?, it was appeared that Necessarily Necessary; 6.45%, Necessary; 50.00%, Common; 29.03%, Not Necessary: 12.90% respectively but Never Necessary appeared as 1.61%.
As a result of questionnaire about question, 'Do you think that the scoring composition to give a more precise discrimination capacity to the configuration and score allocation of the expression property for a fair determination is necessary?, it was appeared that Necessarily Necessary; 11.29%, Necessary; 41.94%, Common; 32.26%, Not Necessary: 14.52% respectively but Never Necessary did not appear.

2. Development of scoring scale index in the of Poomsae match
This study selected the first questionnaire through a prior survey and removed these factors because of a result of statistics which it was difficult to consider No.1 questionnaire and No.5 questionnaire via the second preliminary survey as common factors, and 13 total questionnaires were developed as evaluation scale for objective evaluation for the reason why Nos. 11, 12 and 13 questionnaires are difficult to consider them as common factors via the main survey.
5 composition factors of the accuracy part appeared as ① Accuracy of starting point and ending point ② Accuracy of Jireugi (punching), Chigi (hitting), Makgi (blocking) motion ③ Accuracy of standing posture ④ Accuracy of eyes ⑤ Accuracy of kicking posture. 4 composition factors of the skill part appeared as ① Height of kick ② Power of Jireugi, Chigi, Makgi motion ③ Power of kick motion ④ Balance of motion. 4 composition factors of the expression part appeared as ① Expression of Ki(energy) ② Powerfulness and smoothness (connection property) of motion ③ Rapidness and slowness of Poomsae ④ Rhythm of Poomsae.

3. Comparison between the existing scoring scale index and new scoring scale index
As the result of comparing and analyzing between the existing scoring scale index and new scoring scale index, the existing scoring scale index appeared as the lowest score 7.2 point and the highest score 8.8 point and average score appeared as 8.05 point and standard deviation appeared 0.50.
For the new scoring scale index developed in this study, minimum value appeared as 8.2 point, maximum value 8.6 point, average point 8.4 point, standard deviation 0.11.
Cronbach's α value of the existing scoring scale index appeared as 0.75 and showed the average 37.0% in the discrimination level which shows the interval between average and standard deviation for respondents.
It was appeared that Cronbach's α value of the existing scoring scale index developed by this study showed a very high confidence level of 0.90 and showed average 57.3% in the discrimination level which shows the interval between average and standard deviation for respondents and effectively discriminated the upper/lower capacity of the subject who is evaluated by showing about 50% as standard level.
Thus, it was verified that the scoring scale index developed by this study was useful for reliable, objective and accurate evaluation.
Author(s)
하명진
Issued Date
2014
Awarded Date
2014. 2
Type
Dissertation
Publisher
부경대학교
URI
https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/1662
http://pknu.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000001967071
Alternative Author(s)
Ha. Myeong-JIn
Affiliation
대학원
Department
대학원 체육학과
Advisor
신군수
Table Of Contents
목 차


Ⅰ. 서 론 1
1. 연구의 필요성 1
2. 연구의 목적 5
3. 연구의 문제 5
4. 연구의 제한점 5

Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 6
1. 태권도의 발달 6
2. 태권도 경기종목 8
1) 겨루기 8
2) 품새 9
3. 태권도 품새 경기의 발전 13
4. 태권도 품새 경기의 채점 방법 15
5. 태권도 품새 경기의 문제점 18
6. 품새 경기와 유사한 타 종목 채점규정 20
1) 기계체조(마루운동) 21
2) 스포츠 에어로빅스 24
3) 댄스 스포츠 26
4) 피겨 스케이팅(싱글 스케이팅) 29
5) 싱크로나이즈드 스위밍 31
6) 무용 32
7) 우슈 33
7. 태권도 품새 경기와 타 경기의 채점 비교 35

Ⅲ. 연구방법 37
1. 조사대상 37
1) 사전조사 37
2) 예비조사 38
3) 본조사 38
2. 연구설계 40
3. 조사도구 41
4. 자료처리 44

Ⅵ. 연구결과 45
1. 품새 경기의 채점 항목에 대한 만족도 45
1) 품새 경기 채점 방식에 대한 만족도 45
2) 현 채점지의 구성에 대한 만족도 46
3) 정확성 부분의 채점요인에 대한 만족도 48
4) 숙련성 부분 첫 번째 항목의 채점요인에 대한 만족도 49
5) 숙련성 부분 두 번째 항목의 채점요인에 대한 만족도 51
2. 품새 경기의 채점척도지 개발 결과 53
1) 정확성 59
2) 숙련성 60
3) 표현성 60
3. 현 채점지와 신 채점척도지의 채점결과 비교 63
1) 정확성 부분의 채점결과 65
2) 숙련성 부분의 채점결과 67
3) 표현성 부분의 채점결과 68

Ⅴ. 논 의 71
1. 품새 경기의 채점 항목에 대한 만족도 71
1) 품새 경기 채점 방식에 대한 만족도 71
2) 현 채점지의 구성에 대한 만족도 71
3) 정확성 부분의 채점요인에 대한 만족도 72
4) 숙련성 부분 첫 번째 항목의 채점요인에 대한 만족도 73
5) 숙련성 부분 두 번째 항목의 채점요인에 대한 만족도 74
2. 품새 경기의 채점척도지 개발 결과 75
1) 정확성 77
2) 숙련성 78
3) 표현성 78
3. 현 채점지와 신 채점척도지의 채점결과 비교 80

Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 82
1. 결 론 82
1) 품새 경기의 채점 항목에 대한 만족도 82
2) 품새 경기의 채점척도지 개발 결과 84
3) 현 채점지와 신 채점척도지의 채점결과 비교 85
2. 제 언 86

참 고 문 헌 87
Degree
Doctor
Appears in Collections:
대학원 > 체육학과
Authorize & License
  • Authorize공개
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.