박근혜 대통령의 ‘최순실 국정농단’ 관련 담화문 발표에 대한 신문의 담론 분석

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze President Park Geun-hye's three discourse statements and studies how Park Geun-hye's discourse is transformed and refracted by media In addition the changes in the discourse created as new texts and the relationship between the ideology and power embedded in the discourse were observed. For this purpose, this study applied the method of critical discourse analysis of Fairclough to conduct discourse practice analysis and socio-cultural practice analysis The subjects of analysis are the 1st Park Geun-hye talks to the people October 24, 2016), the 2nd Park Geun-hye talks to the people November 4 2016), and the 3rd Park Geun-hye talks to the people on November 29, 2016.. And these are texts related to Park Geun-hye's discourse created by two media companies representing the right-wing and left-wing press, the Chosun Ilbo and the Hankyoreh. Text analysis was performed to analyze and observe aspects of words and vocabulary that can infer the implications of power relations and ideology through linguistic devices. As a result, it was revealed that Park Geun-hye's discourse used a language device that made it impossible to discriminate causal relations through framing device, passive voice, frequent writing, colloquial expression ,and the subjunctive mood. The media discourses of the Chosun Ilbo and the Hankyoreh, which reported Park Geun-hye's discourse, used verbal intransitive verbalization and passive voice in common. Through this, the subject of action was concealed. .The events was amplified through metaphors. By using mitigating expressions such as questioning, it was attempted to dilute aggressive speech and increase acceptance of the consumer.It was the same that I expected a strong engraving effect through giving a frame and writing frequently. In particular, the both media were similar in that they used local coherence sentences in the voices of reporters.The following is an Intertextuality analysis that explores the representation of new texts through the transformation of the discourse of President Park Geun-hye and the discourse of the both media. Park Geun-hye deleted “Park Geun-hye-Choi Soon-sil's manipulation of state affairs”, which is the central content of the media’s Choi Soon-sil file report.So, the relationship with Soon-Sil Choi created a new text called Private Relationship. The both media tried to transform and refraction reporters' voices, specific and unspecified reporters, interview genres and discourse.Through this, in terms of constructing a new text, the same reporting pattern was revealed.But the content of the transformation was different. For example, the Chosun Ilbo altered the text by boldly deleting Park Geun-hye's discourse and adding emotional language. So Park Geun-hye made “the heroine of the tragic love.”. On the other hand, the Hankyoreh transformed the text by adding the superior voice of legal procedure articles. The Hankyoreh transformed the text of Park Geun-hye's “Private Relationship with Choi Soon-sil” into a new text “Park Geun-hye president's resignation.”. In the analysis of social and cultural practice, the work of the ideology behind the discourse of Park Geun-hye and the discourse of Park Geun-hye, the reproduction and transformation of the discourse, and the response and cracks of thedominant discourse were quested from three aspects. First, the results of analyzing the ideological power effect through verbal expression devices such as passive voice, noun form, frequent writing, and speech are as follows.The both media promoted power relations and ideological effects using the same linguistic device. The Hankyoreh stipulated that Park Geun-hye was not eligible for the president through a linguistic expression device.However, the Chosun Ilbo chose a method of urging himself to self and restore the President's authority. The Hankyoreh defined this case as a a bizarre events of “Park Geun-hye-Choi Soon-sil” and identified Park Geun-hye as a criminal. On the other hand, the Chosun Ilbo accused Park Geun-hye of being a scarecrow ruler. However, it tried to limit the case to 'Choi Soon-sil Gate', pointing to the final manager as Choi Soon-sil. In other words, the both media report Park Geun-hye's discourse through various verbal expression devices, but the result is contradictory in terms of power relations. Second, the ideology and power effect through special words such as “national” and “state” were analyzed.In Park Geun-hye's discourse statement to the people, words such as ‘nation’, ‘state affairs’, and ‘our country’ are repeatedly called in the same context as ‘the people’ in order to harmonize the people and Park Geun-hye. On the other hand, theChosun Ilbo reports on Park Geun-hye's discourse and calls “people”, “Country”, and “Korea” to correspond the will of the people and the Chosun Ilbo.The Hankyoreh also makes the tone that the arguments of the Hankyoreh take the place of the people through the use of the words “national” and “state affairs” which is a transformed words for the people. Park Geun-hye, the Chosun Ilbo and the Hankyoreh are the same in that they called the “national people” that generate a strong ideological effect without proof.Additionally Park Geun-hye and the two media companies attempted to operate power through abstract language that could not be proved because there was no subject of action called “people, country, state”.In Park Geun-hye's second discourse, the words “we” is added, which performs the function of occupying a collective identity and the position of a legal representative.In the news of the two media companies about Park Geun-hye's discourse to the public, the term “security,” which is evaluated as one of the anti-communist ideologies, is used to construct the tone in order to achieve the ruling hegemony. It is noteworthy that the progressive journalist the Hankyoreh>also used security ideology. It proves some extent that the Hankyoreh chose an ideological vocabulary regardless of whether it was a ruling ideology or an opposing ideology in order to exert the intended power function. Third, it is a study on the transformation and cracking of power by media discourses. Analyzing the time and content of Park Geun-hye's discourse presentation, and the media discourse of the Chosun Ilbo, it cannot be considered to have reported Park Geun-hye's discourse in the usual way. It seems that the Chosun Ilbo guided the timing and content of Park Geun-hye's discourse statement. This indicates that the Chosun Ilbo can be turned into a newspaper that guides a specific faction at certain times leading to a crack in power, rather than a simple factional newspaper. The Hankyoreh is the same. the Hankyoreh also consistently amplified the crisis of the regime and did not hesitate to act as a control tower for impeachment. When the opposition party at the time hesitated to impeach Park Geun-hye or did not take action, the Hankyoreh exerts strong practical power and mobilization power for political power in the name of public opinion. According to the study, the media shows itself not only as a circulator of ideology but also a part of power at a certain point in time such as the power crisis