PUKYONG

An Analysis of Determinants for Sustainable Construction in Vietnam

Metadata Downloads
Alternative Title
베트남의 지속가능한 건설을 위한 결정 요인 분석
Abstract
The construction sector plays a main role for the delivery of sustainable development but it also has a certain impact on environment. The key challenge for the sector is to reduce influences of its activities on environment and society. Principles of sustainable construction need to guarantee sustainable development for the construction sector. However, because of unclear definition of sustainable construction, many problems appear as applying this definition for a particular country. The problem is that the definition of sustainable construction can vary based on the size, economic development level as well as social, cultural and other factors of a country.
Therefore, this study is undertaken to explore the various aspects of the pursuit of sustainable construction in Vietnam, namely: the criteria of sustainability, barriers of sustainability practice, drivers for achieving sustainability, appropriate solutions to improve sustainability. The aspects of the sustainability in this study just revolve around three dimensions: environment, economy, and society. For these reasons, the six objectives of this study are: (1) Identify the criteria of sustainability in the construction industry in Vietnam, (2) Identify the barriers of sustainability practice, (3) Identify drivers for achieving sustainability, (4) Develop a structural model that demonstrates the relationships among factors affecting sustainability by Structural Equation Model (SEM) method, (5) Develop a prediction model of sustainability by System Dynamics method, and (6) Propose appropriate solutions to improve sustainability.
Based on a comprehensive literature review and survey questionnaires, the study identified the criteria of sustainability interested by construction firms in Vietnam. The result identified the five most important environment criteria of sustainability, including: Dust, Land use, Waste management, Construction ventilation, and Odors. The five most important economy criteria of sustainability are: Optimization of resources use, Cost, quality and schedule, Suppliers management, Availability of materials and machinery, and Use of local materials. The five most important society criteria of sustainability are: Competent employees attracted and maintained, Reputation, Relationship between managers and employees, Health and safety of workers be ensured, and Competition and high quality of projects.
Next, through evaluations of the respondents to the barriers and drivers in achieving the sustainability, the five most significant barriers identified are: Additional costs for training, No awareness of sustainable construction, Lack of client awareness and demand for sustainable construction, Incompetence, and Lack of legislation. And five drivers considered very important in pursuit of the sustainability, including: Creation of a healthy environment, Enhanced security, Enhance reputation, Enhance relations with stakeholders, and Sharing of knowledge.
The next objective of this study is to develop a structural model that demonstrates the relationships among factors affecting sustainability by Structural Equation Model (SEM) method. Only significant attributes of the factors are considered to have significant effects on sustainability. The attributes are classified into the following factors: Sustainable practices, Resources, Drivers, Internal, Barriers, and Leadership. The respondents were asked to assess the effect of these attributes on the sustainability. To determine how strong the attributes represent the above factors, a measurement model was deployed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Attributes that cannot represent the factors were removed. The fit measurement model are defined to include only strongly influential attributes on the sustainability. After the reliability of the fit measurement model has been confirmed, a structural model has been developed and rigorously tested by Structural Equation Model (SEM) to determine the relationships among the factors that affect the sustainability and sustainability which includes three aspects: environment sustainability, economy sustainability, and society sustainability. The result of the SEM model shows that there are four factors that have a strong impact on the sustainability: Sustainable practices, Resources, Drivers, and Leadership. However, Internal and Barriers do not have any impact on the sustainability.
The causal relationships identified in the SEM model will be inputs to the development of the sustainability predictive model by using the System Dynamics method. In the developed System Dynamics model, the Sustainability index will be affected by four dynamic models: Sustainable practices, Drivers, Leadership, and Resources. The Sustainability index will be the sum of the following indexes: Sustainable practices index, Resources index, Drivers index, and Leadership index. Various policy scenarios and sensitivity analyzes were also performed to test the reliability of the developed model. The results show that the behavior of the model is insensitive to changes of the indices in the model. So the results of the model are highly reliable. The most important implication of the model is that construction companies in Vietnam need to focus their efforts on improving leadership since this is the most significant factor driving other factors to develop.
This study helps stakeholders in the construction industry in Vietnam particularly and other regions generally gain the insight into the criteria, barriers, drivers and policies that need to be focused on when pursuing sustainability. This study is especially valuable in developing countries.
Author(s)
PHAM THANH HAI
Issued Date
2019
Awarded Date
2019. 2
Type
Dissertation
Keyword
Determinants Sustainable Construction Vietnam
Publisher
부경대학교
URI
https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/23058
http://pknu.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000178237
Affiliation
부경대학교 대학원
Department
대학원 건설관리공학협동과정
Advisor
김수용
Table Of Contents
ABSTRACT i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF FIGURES ix
LIST OF TABLES xi
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background and objectives 1
1.2 Scope and methodology of research 4
1.2.1 Scope of research 4
1.2.2 Research methodology 4
1.2.3 The study framework 4
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 6
2.1 The framework of chapter 2 6
2.2 Definitions of sustainable development and sustainable construction 6
2.3 Criteria of sustainability 8
2.4 Barriers of sustainability 18
2.5 Drivers 23
2.6 Determinants affecting sustainability 27
2.6.1 The practices of sustainability 27
2.6.2 Leadership of sustainability 31
2.6.3 Resources of sustainability 33
2.7 Conclusion 37
CHAPTER 3: DATA AND ANALYSES 38
3.1 The framework of chapter 3 38
3.2 The questionnaire and respondent profile 39
3.2.1 The questionnaire 39
3.2.2 Respondent profile 40
3.3 Analysis of sustainability criteria 42
3.3.1 Ranking of environment criteria 42
3.3.2 Ranking of economy criteria 43
3.3.3 Ranking of society criteria 45
3.3.4 Consensus within groups of respondents on sustainability criteria 46
3.3.5 Consensus among groups of respondents on sustainability criteria 48
3.3.6 Consensus within groups of working experience on sustainability criteria 50
3.3.7 Consensus among groups of working experience on sustainability criteria 52
3.4 Analysis of sustainability barriers 53
3.4.1 Consensus within groups of respondents on sustainability barriers 55
3.4.2 Consensus among groups of respondents on sustainability barriers 56
3.5 Analysis of sustainability drivers 57
3.5.1 Consensus within groups of respondents on sustainability drivers 58
3.5.2 Consensus among groups of respondents on sustainability drivers 59
3.6 Conclusion 60
CHAPTER 4: STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL OF DETERMINANTS AFFECTING SUSTAINABILITY 61
4.1 The framework of chapter 4 61
4.2 Structural equation model 62
4.2.1 Confirmatory factor analysis 63
4.2.2 Structural Equation Model (SEM) 66
4.3 Conclusion 70
CHAPTER 5: SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODEL TO IMPROVE SUSTAINABILITY 71
5.1 The framework of chapter 5 71
5.2 System Dynamics approach 72
5.3 Causal loop diagram and stock-flow diagram of System Dynamics 72
5.3.1 The dynamic model of Sustainable practices 76
5.3.2 The dynamic model of Drivers 77
5.3.3 The dynamic model of Leadership 78
5.3.4 The dynamic model of Resources 79
5.3.5 The dynamic model of Sustainability 80
5.4 The result and discussion of dynamic model of Sustainability 82
5.5 Sensitivity analysis of dynamic model of Sustainability 86
5.6 Discussion 91
5.7 Conclusion 92
CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS 94
6.1 Contributions of the research 94
6.2 Limitations and recommendations for further researches 95
REFERENCES 97
APPENDIX: THE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE 122
Degree
Doctor
Appears in Collections:
대학원 > 건설관리공학협동과정
Authorize & License
  • Authorize공개
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.