PUKYONG

Biofuel productions from soybean residue and seaweed via separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) process

Metadata Downloads
Abstract
Bioenergy can be produced via fermentation from any biomaterial containing sufficient polysaccharide or equivalent materials that can be degraded into monosaccharides, such as starch or cellulose. Traditionally, bioenergy has been produced from first-generation biomass, such as starch or sugars using sugarcane, wheat, and corn. However, first-generation biomass can also be used as a human food or animal feed, which has caused moral problems and concerns regarding increasing prices. Bioenergy has also been produced from second-generation biomass such as lignocellulosic biomass and agricultural waste products as second-generation biomass, such as the stalks of corn and wheat, straw, grass and wood chips. However, feedstock has low yields and high costs with efficient hydrolysis processes using current technologies. Therefore, the soybean residue and seaweed were used as a new biomass in this study for bioenergy production.
The polysaccharide from the soybean residue was used for bioethanol production via the separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF). The study focused on the pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification and fermentation. The pretreatment to obtain monosaccharide was carried out with 20% (w/v) soybean residue slurry and 270 mM H2SO4 at 121℃ for 60 min. More monosaccharide was obtained from enzymatic hydrolysis with 16 Units/mL mixture of commercial enzymes CTec 2 and Viscozyme L at 45℃ for 48 h. Ethanol fermentation with 20% (w/v) soybean residue hydrolysate was performed using wild-type and adapted Saccharomyces cerevisiae KCTC 1126 to high concentrations of galactose using a flask and 5 L fermenter. When wild-type of S. cerevisiae was used, the ethanol production of 20.77 g/L with ethanol yield of 0.31 was obtained. The ethanol production of 33.89 g/L and 31.64 g/L with ethanol yield of 0.49 and 0.47 were produced using adapted S. cerevisiae to the high concentration of galactose in a flask and 5 L fermenter, respectively. As a results, S. cerevisiae adapted to galactose increased the ethanol yield comparing to wild-type of S. cerevisiae.
Bioethanol was produced using the separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) process with macroalgae polysaccharide from the seaweed, Gelidium amansii as a biomass. The study focused on the thermal acid hydrolysis pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification, detoxification and fermentation of red macroalgae, G. amansii. The thermal acid hydrolysis was carried out with H2SO4, slurry content (8~16%) and treatment time (15~75 min). As results, 12% (w/v) seaweed slurry, 182 mM H2SO4 at 121℃ for 45 min were selected as optimal conditions for thermal acid hydrolysis obtaining 6.8g/L glucose and 26.1g/L galactose. A monosaccharide (mainly glucose) was obtained from enzymatic hydrolysis of thermal acid hydrolysate, with 16 Units/mL commercial enzyme (Celluclast 1.5 L) at 45℃ for 36 h. Detoxification were carried out with adsorption method using activated carbon, overliming method using Ca(OH)2, and ion-exchange method using polyethyleneimine. Among those detoxification methods, activated carbon showed the best result for removal of hydroxymethylfurfural. Ethanol fermentation with 12% (w/v) seaweed hydrolysate was performed using wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae and adapted S. cerevisiae to galactose.
Acetone, butanol and ethanol (ABE) were produced following the separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) method using polysaccharides from the green macroalgae Enteromorpha intestinalis as biomass. We focused on the optimization of enzymatic saccharification as pretreatments for the fermentation of E. intestinalis. Pretreatment was carried out with 10% (w/v) seaweed slurry and 270 mM H2SO4 at 121°C for 60 min. Monosaccharides (mainly glucose) were obtained from enzymatic hydrolysis with a 16 Units/mL mixture of Celluclast 1.5 L and Viscozyme L at 45°C for 36 h. ABE fermentation with 10% (w/v) E. intestinalis hydrolysate was performed using the anaerobic bacteria Clostridium acetobutylicum with either uncontrolled pH, pH controlled at 6.0, or pH controlled initially at 6.0 and then 4.5 after 4 days, which produced ABE contents of 5.6 g/L with an ABE yield (YABE) of 0.24 g/g, 4.8 g/L with an YABE of 0.2 g/g, and 8.5 g/L with an YABE of 0.36 g/g, respectively.
As a results, The maximum ethanol concentration was 33.89 g/L, with YEtOH of 0.49 and obtained using SHF with S. cerevisiae adapted to the high concentration of galactose when soybean residue was used as a biomass.The activated carbon can be suitable for detoxification of G. amansii hydrolysate using for ethanol fermentation which showed the highest efficiency reducing HMF by 89.5% and ethanol concentration of 20.28 g/L with YEtOH of 0.47 were obtained. ABE fermentation from E. intestinalis was carried out with pH controlled at 6.0 and then at 4.5 on day 4, which produced an ABE content of 8.5 g/L with a YABE 0.36 g/g.
Author(s)
NGUYEN TRUNG HAU
Issued Date
2019
Awarded Date
2019. 2
Type
Dissertation
Publisher
부경대학교
URI
https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/23079
http://pknu.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000182111
Affiliation
부경대학교 대학원
Department
대학원 생물공학과
Advisor
김성구
Table Of Contents
LIST OF TABLES V
LIST OF FIGURES VI
ABSTRACT IX
GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1
PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY 4
REFERENCES 6

Chapter. I. Bioethanol production from soybean residue via separate hydrolysis and fermentation

1.1. Introduction 10
1.2. Materials and Methods 12
1.2.1. Raw materials and composition analysis 12
1.2.2. Thermal acid hydrolysis 12
1.2.3. Selection of enzyme and enzymatic saccharification 13
1.2.4. Fermentation 14
1.2.4.1. Seed culture and adaptation of yeasts 14
1.2.4.2. Ethanol fermentation 15
1.2.5. Analytical methods 17
1.2.6. Statistical analysis 17
1.3. Results and Discussion 18
1.3.1. Composition of soybean residue 18
1.3.2. Effect of optimal slurry content 20
1.3.3. Optimization of thermal acid hydrolysis 22
1.3.4. Selection of enzyme for enzymatic saccharification 25
1.3.5. Selection of yeast and fermentation with wild-type
S. cerevisiae and S. cerevisiae adapted to galactose 29
1.3.6. Fermentation with wild-type S. cerevisiae and S. cerevisiae adapted to galactose 29
1.4. Conclusion 34
1.5. References 35

Chapter. II. Bioethanol production from red seaweed, Gelidium amansii via detoxification (HMF removal) and SHF

2.1. Introduction 41
2.2. Materials and Methods 43
2.2.1. Raw materials and composition analysis 43
2.2.2. Thermal acid hydrolysis pretreatment 43
2.2.3. Removal of HMF using various method 45
2.2.4. Seed culture and adaption of yeasts to high concentration of galactose 46
2.2.5. Ethanol fermentation 47
2.2.6. Analytical methods 47
2.2.7. Statistical analysis 48
2.3. Results and Discussion 49
2.3.1. Composition of G. amansii 49
2.3.2. Thermal acid hydrolysis 49
2.3.3. Enzymatic saccharification 53
2.3.4. Detoxification of hydrolysates using various methods 55
2.3.5. Bioethanol fermentation 61
2.4. Conclusion 66
2.5. References 67


Chapter. III. ABE fermentation from the green seaweed Enteromorpha intestinalis via the separate hydrolysis and fermentation

3.1. Introduction 73
3.2. Materials and Methods 76
3.2.1. Raw materials and composition analysis 76
3.2.2. Bacterial strains and culture medium 77
3.2.3. Thermal acid hydrolysis pretreatment 78
3.2.4. Enzymatic saccharification 79
3.2.5. ABE fermentation 70
3.2.6. Analytical methods 81
3.2.7. Statistical analysis 81
3.3. Results and Discussion 83
3.3.1. Composition of Enteromorpha intestinalis 83
3.3.2. Monosaccharide production via thermal acid hydrolysis 83
3.3.3. Enzymatic saccharification 87
3.3.4. Effect of hydrolysate pH on Clostridium acetobutylicum growth 91
3.3.5. ABE production using the separate hydrolysis and fermentation method 93
3.4. Conclusion 99
3.5. References 100
SUMMARY (in Korean) 106
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 109
Degree
Doctor
Appears in Collections:
대학원 > 생물공학과
Authorize & License
  • Authorize공개
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.