PUKYONG

폐기물 소각시설에서의 CO2 배출량 산정방법에 대한 비교 연구

Metadata Downloads
Alternative Title
Comparison of the methods for estimation of CO2 emission from waste incinerators
Abstract
According to the IPCC Climate Change Comprehensive Assessment Report published in 2014, CO2 released into the atmosphere from the 1750s to 2011 is estimated to be 2040±310GtCO2, and 50% of the total greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere since the Industrial Revolution. In particular, despite the global greenhouse gas reduction measures since the 2000s, the impact of negative climate change is increasing as greenhouse gas emissions are deepening. In order to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, it is the first step to calculate the exact emission for each source. Therefore, the Climate Change Convention(UNFCCC) provides guidelines through IPCC for calculating the amount of greenhouse gases emitted by each country. In regard to this, in the case of incineration of waste, the calculation process is complicated, so it is recommended that the method by direct measurement is very accurate and transparent.
Currently, in the case of domestic waste incineration facilities, the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions is estimated by calculation method. In this case, CO2 emissions are calculated considering the characteristics analysis of incinerated wastes such as amount, dry weight and carbon content. However, each emission factor applied in the calculation process has a low accuracy and high uncertainty in that it is calculated using some measurements and most of them uses the default value(Default Factor) provided by the IPCC. Therefore, the IPCC recommends direct measurement for estimating greenhouse gases in waste incineration facilities. At this points, due to the infrastructure of Tele-Monitoring System(TMS) established in Korea, continuous measurement of CO2 emissions(CEMS) is possible in waste incineration facilities.
Therefore, in order to study the effectiveness of calculating greenhouse gas emissions through continuous measurement of waste incineration facilities, we selected waste incineration facilities operated in Korea and applied Tier1 calculation method(calculation formula) according to IPCC guidelines and Tier4 a continuous measurement method which is the fundamental purpose of this study, are compared and analyzed. In addition, we tried to identify the problems of the method of calculating the greenhouse gas emissions of the waste incineration sector currently applied by comparing the emission factors provided by the IPCC guidelines with the average value of the incineration facilities selected in this study. The study was conducted annually from 2014 to 2016 in consideration of the time series. The target incinerators for the study was conducted at two municipal and two industrial waste incinerators in consideration of the characteristics of incineration waste.
The main results of this study are that the proportion of 6 wastes in CO2 emissions in the order of plastics, papers, and textiles in the municipal waste incineration is estimated to exceed 95%, and in the case of industrial wastes, CO2 emissions from 4 waste types, including petroleum, others, and construction waste exceeded 95% of total emissions.
Second, in the case of municipal waste incineration, there is a certain level of difference between Tier1 and Tier3 CO2 calculations, however in case of Tier4 CO2 emission is depended on the incineration efficiency. This consideration is also found in the industrial waste incineration.
Third, Tier1 relative uncertainty is found to be between 21.11% and 74.29% in M-B facilities, which are municipal waste, and 78.05% and 430.21% in I-B facilities, which are industrial waste. The relative uncertainty according to the Tier3 method was found to range from 9.22% to 38.48% in M-B facilities, which are municipal waste facilities, and from 20.05% to 765% in I-B facilities, In the case of Tier4, the CO2 concentration uncertainty of municipal waste M-B facility performed during the inspection period was an average of 0.02405, and the average uncertainty of the flow period was 0.03442727. As a result, the relative uncertainty of the M-B facility was 4.118 percent, and the relative uncertainty of the I-B facility was 10.564 percent.
Therefore, in the case of domestic incineration facilities, it is advantageous to calculate CO2 emissions by continuous measurement method using the currently constructed TMS infrastructure in terms of accuracy of emission and transparency of the calculation process.
Author(s)
오승환
Issued Date
2019
Awarded Date
2019. 2
Type
Dissertation
Keyword
온실가스 소각시설 CO2 배출계수
Publisher
부경대학교
URI
https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/23405
http://pknu.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000178121
Alternative Author(s)
Seung Hwan Oh
Affiliation
부경대학교 대학원
Department
대학원 지구환경공학학ㆍ연협동과정
Advisor
강임석
Table Of Contents
1. 서 론 1
2. 이론적 배경 5
2.1. 온실가스 배출량 산정 5
2.1.1. 국제적 기준 5
2.1.1.1. IPCC 지침 개념 5
2.1.1.2. IPCC의 직접측정 7
2.1.1.3. IPCC 폐기물 소각 지침 9
2.1.2. 국내 산정방법 12
2.1.2.1. 국가 배출량 산정 12
2.1.2.2. 배출권거래제 적용현황 13
2.1.2.3. 배출권거래제 연속측정 15
2.2. 연속측정 국내외 사례 18
2.2.1 국내사례 18
2.2.1.1. 굴뚝 연속자동측정시스템(TMS) 18
2.2.1.2. 국내 연속측정 연구사례 20
2.2.2. 해외사례 22
2.2.2.1. 미국의 사례 23
2.2.2.2. 유럽의 사례 25
2.2.3. 국내외 사례비교 29
2.3. 불확도의 개념 30
2.3.1. 불확도 정의 30
2.3.2. 불확도 원인 31
2.3.3. 불확도 평가절차 32
2.3.4. 불확도 평가방법 34
3. 연구방법 37
3.1. 측정 소각시설 선정 37
3.1.1. 측정소각시설 현황 40
3.1.1.1. M-B 소각시설 40
3.1.1.2. M-Y 소각시설 40
3.1.1.3. I-B 소각시설 41
3.1.1.4. I-K 소각시설 41
3.2. CO2 배출계수 분석 42
3.2.1. 폐기물 성상분석 42
3.2.2. 건조무게(dm) 측정 44
3.2.3. 폐기물 탄소함량(FC) 분석 45
3.2.4. 화석탄소함량(FCF) 분석 45
3.2.4.1. 시료 샘플링 45
3.2.4.2. 화석탄소함량 분석장치 46
3.2.4.3. 화석탄소함량 분석방법 47
3.3. CO2 연속측정 시스템 50
3.3.1. CO2 연속측정기기 51
3.3.2. 교정용 가스 53
3.3.3. 측정기기 성능 53
3.3.4. 연속측정 시스템 구성 55
3.3.5. 측정기기 정도관리 56
3.3.6. 측정기기 유지관리 58
3.4. 배출량 산정방법 59
3.5. 불확도 검증 62
3.5.1. Tier1 불확도 산정 62
3.5.2. Tier3 불확도 산정 63
3.5.3. Tier4 불확도 산정 64
4. 결과 및 고찰 69
4.1. 방식별(Tier) 배출량 분석 70
4.1.1. 방식별 배출계수 결과 70
4.1.1.1. 시설별 폐기물 성상 비율 70
4.1.1.2. 시설별 폐기물 (dm, CF) 분석 75
4.1.2. 배출계수 보정 및 배출량 평가 83
4.1.2.1. 배출계수 보정 83
4.1.2.2. 방식별 배출량 분석 85
4.2. 연속측정(Tier4) 실효성 평가 89
4.2.1 방식별 배출계수 결과 89
4.2.1.1. 시설별 폐기물 성상비율 89
4.2.1.2. 시설별 폐기물(dm, CF) 분석 97
4.2.1.3. 시설별 화석탄소함량(FCF) 결과 111
4.2.2. 배출계수 종합평가 113
4.2.3 시설별 배출량 산정결과 115
4.3. 연속측정(Tier4) 검증 119
4.3.1 배출계수(dm, CF) 개발 119
4.3.2 화석탄소함량 (FCF) 개발 122
4.3.3 배출량 산정결과 126
4.4. 방식별 불확도 평가 132
5. 요약 및 결론 135
References 142
Degree
Doctor
Appears in Collections:
대학원 > 지구환경공학연협동과정
Authorize & License
  • Authorize공개
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.