발달장애 형제자매가 있는 비장애 형제자매의 가족에 대한 태도

Abstract

A concrete plan is to provide support for adult development-impaired families and their adult non-disabled siblings by analyzing their attitudes to future adult development-impaired families and their families greatly contributing and affecting them in the context of social change. In this study, Q methodologies were applied to understand subjective family perception patterns of non-disabled siblings, and to examine the characteristics and differences of each type. The Q-population to examine the attitudes of non-disabled brothers and sisters to their families was composed of interviews with six adults aged 18 and older with brothers and sisters with developmental disabilities and consideration of prior documents. After arbitrarily selecting a statement that researchers thought would express their attitudes toward family members, the researchers adjusted their opinions and selected 40 Q samples. Forty non-disabled brothers and sisters, including those interviewed, were selected as P samples, and the Q classification was carried out on a scale of nine points composed of +4 in terms of subjective consent to each a question. After that, we used the QUANL pc program to analyze the attitudes of non-disabled brothers and sisters towards their families in four categories. The characteristics of the types identified in this study are as follows. Type I thinks that it's the concept of "the most fortunate people who make me feel at ease and have my happy times together." In addition, in an important choice, I gave priority to my family and expressed a strong connection with my happiness and gave positive feedback to my family. However, non-disabled siblings think that they should not have negative emotions and sometimes control negative emotions themselves. Therefore, it is necessary to take into consideration the idea of allowing the Type 1 to prepare for independence and individualization as an adult, based on the current love for family. Type II is a reassuring person who believes in his family and believes he has an organic relationship with himself. But they were focused on their own personal lives, which focused on their goals and important choices, and where families thought that they were the center of life, not the center of life. Therefore, type 2 is not required to be sacrificed to an individual, and it is necessary to provide a support plan that enables all family members to mutually support their families so that they can achieve their own goals. Type III "Family is the person I have to protect and I feel responsible and can become an obstacle." Also, I don't feel Jewish and I don't make myself comfortable, and I think it's a hard and burdensome existence. To develop and strengthen a program capable of enhancing the level of family cohesion and improving the degree of relationship satisfaction through this type of program, which experiences a burden on a vague future while family ties are not good. Type IV refers to the people I have to protect my family as Type III, and the sense of responsibility was leading. However, I think my family is always happy and helpful, considering my family's top priority in life. This type of family-backed model will be able to better cope with it through social support as well as family support. Therefore, various methods are needed to reduce stress on future care through social support programs and various activities with self-help groups in environments similar to themselves. This study provides support for adult non-disabled brothers and sisters and explains their attitudes to their families. Support for adult non-disabled brothers and sisters is next to the state protection of important disabled children.