비핵화 과정에 대한 비교 연구
- Alternative Title
- A Comparative Study on Denuclearization Process : Focusing on Realism, Neoliberalism, and Constructivism
- Abstract
- The purpose of this study is to understand the situation of the countries that have achieved the denuclearization and the theoretical review of the nuclear possession and the denuclearization in order to find a way to denuclearize North Korea, The purpose of this paper is to provide the theoretical implications of North Korea 's nuclear issue, which must be denuclearized. The cases of South Africa, Ukraine, Libya, and Iran were analyzed.
First, from a realistic point of view, countries that have attempted to develop nuclear weapons have experienced serious threats to national security, and believe that they can not find a solution to the security imbalance by supplementing conventional weapons themselves. In the end, in the case of nuclear abandonment, these security issues have been solved, or if there is confidence in security, the process of denuclearization could be reached.
Second, one of the realistic viewpoints is that the most appropriate way to induce denuclearization is through international sanctions including the economy. The economic sanctions that have been carried out for a long period of time have resulted not only in the contraction of the national economy but also in the countryside, and denuclearization has been recognized as the only alternative to resolve the objections. It is also a benefit of denuclearization that a substantial amount of economic compensation is rewarded by the denuclearization in the case of international agreement on relative compensation for denuclearization.
Third, most of the countries that have attempted to develop nuclear weapons have opted for independence and isolationism from international regimes and regimes at the time of development. What is important in the phase of denuclearization is that these countries are accompanied by participation in international institutions.
Fourth, the most important role of denuclearization in the viewpoint of constructivist theory is the emergence and diffusion of new interpretations of national identity and national interests. In other words, in the midst of being able to make a reasonable decision, we can confirm that the problems of nuclear possession are highlighted and the merits of denuclearization are accepted through the advancement of power of reformers
As mentioned above, realism, neoliberalism, and organizational theory are useful theories for explaining nuclear development and denuclearization. The importance of the theory is that it clarifies the framework of the case analysis and enables accurate analysis and countermeasure. From this point of view, theoretical analysis of the denuclearization case is a meaningful task for us to pursue the theoretical approach to the denuclearization of North Korea.
- Author(s)
- 김경민
- Issued Date
- 2019
- Awarded Date
- 2019. 2
- Type
- Dissertation
- Keyword
- 비핵화 북핵 현실주의 신자유주의 구성주의
- Publisher
- 부경대학교
- URI
- https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/24010
http://pknu.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000182219
- Affiliation
- 부경대학교 국제대학원
- Department
- 국제대학원 국제학과
- Advisor
- 이홍종
- Table Of Contents
- 목 차
Ⅰ. 서론 ···································································1
1. 연구 배경 및 목적 ···························································1
2. 문헌연구 ······························································3
3. 연구 방법 및 구성····························································5
Ⅱ. 핵무기 관련 국제정치이론 ·········································7
1. 현실주의 이론 : 핵개발을 촉진하는 안보위협····························7
2. 신자유주의 이론 : 비핵화를 위한 국제협력······························14
3. 구성주의 이론 : 국가 간 특수성의 강조 ·······························17
Ⅲ. 비핵화 과정에 대한 비교 연구···································23
1. 남아프리카공화국 사례····················································23
가. 핵무기 개발 사유 ···············································23
나. 핵 포기 사유 및 과정···················································25
다. 분석·······································································26
2. 우크라이나 사례····················································28
가. 핵무기 개발 사유 ···············································28
나. 핵 포기 사유 및 과정···················································29
다. 분석·······································································30
3. 리비아 사례·································································32
가. 핵무기 개발 사유 ···············································32
나. 핵 포기 사유 및 과정···················································33
다. 분석·······································································33
4. 이란 사례·································································35
가. 핵무기 개발 사유 ···············································35
나. 핵 포기 사유 및 과정···················································36
다. 분석·······································································37
5. 북한 사례·································································38
가. 핵무기 개발 과정 ···············································38
나. 비핵화의 가능성 ···················································41
다. 분석·······································································43
Ⅳ. 국제정치이론별 비핵화 과정 비교·······························49
1. 현실주의 이론······························································49
2. 신자유주의 이론·····························································51
3. 구성주의 이론······························································52
Ⅴ. 결론 ·································································54
참고문헌 ·······························································61
- Degree
- Master
-
Appears in Collections:
- 글로벌정책대학원 > 국제학과
- Authorize & License
-
- Files in This Item:
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.