중소기업의 기술협력 네트워크와 흡수능력이 기술혁신성과에 미치는 영향
- Alternative Title
- The Effects of Technological Collaboration Network and Absorptive Capacity on Innovation Output in Small and Medium–sized Firm: A Study on Moderating Effects of Strategic type of Technological Learning
- Abstract
- This study suggests that the technological collaboration network and firm’s absorptive capacity have significant effects on the innovation output of the small and medium-sized firms (SME). In addition, a firm’s strategic type of technological learning moderates the relationship between network, absorptive capacity and innovation output.
To test the hypotheses, data were collected from the SMEs that have participated in the development of mixed and fusional technology projects (DMFTP) supported by TIPA. Survey questionnaires were distributed to 496 firms, which were selected from the enrolled firm list of DMFTP. Of the 496 firms, 135 firms responded to the questionnaire (27.2% response rate). 24 firms were excluded that had incomplete responses.
Two dimensions of a firm’s technological collaboration network were considered in the model: the structural embeddedness (magnitude and diversity) and relational embeddedness (trust). The magnitude was measured by the total number of technological collaboration relationships that a firm has entered into with external firms or institutions during recent three years. The diversity was measured by the number of modes of relationships with external firms or institutions a firm adopts among the eight categories (supplier, competitor, buyer, university, public and private research institute, technical training institutions, etc.). Trust was measured using 12 items consisted of three dimensions: goodwill trust(5 items), competence trust(4 items), financial trust(3 items). The absorptive capacity was measured by R&D intensity that is defined as R&D expenditure divided by sales. In this study two strategic type of technological learning were considered: the exploration and exploitation, and 8 items were used to measure them. The innovation output was represented by the total amount of seven specific measures: the number of intellectual property rights(IPRs) applications, registration of IPRs, development of new products and processes, improvement of existing products and processes, and quality certifications received from domestic and foreign institutions. In addition, this study used three control variables including industry sector, firm age, and the stage of product life cycle of the firm’s main product.
Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were used to examine the hypotheses. First, when entering the control variables in step one, industry sectors, firm age and stage of product life cycle were statistically significant in predicting the innovation output. This result shows the validity of using them as control variables.
Second, when entering the technological collaboration network and absorptive capacity as well as control variables in step two, the result showed that the magnitude of technological collaboration network had significant and positive effect on the innovation output. This result implies that network is an important means by which SMEs can promote their innovation.
Third, when entering the strategic type of technological learning as well as control variables, and the independent variables in step three, the result showed that the magnitude of technological collaboration network and exploration had significant and positive effects on the innovation output. On the other hand, absorptive capacity had significant and negative effects on the innovation output. These results imply that firms with higher levels of exploration learning are likely to be more innovative while firms with lower levels of absorptive capacity are likely to be less innovative.
Fourth, when entering the interaction terms of network, absorptive capacity and technological learning, the result showed that the interaction between absorptive capacity and exploitation learning had negative and significant effect on the innovation output. This result supports for the moderating effects of technological learning on the relationship between the absorptive capacity and innovation output, and implies that in order of SMEs to enhance the innovation output, it is useful for the firm with lower absorptive capacity to adopt exploitation learning strategy.
Based on the empirical results several theoretical and practical implications were suggested.
Key word: Technological collaboration network, absorptive capacity, technological learning, innovation output
- Author(s)
- 송재은
- Issued Date
- 2013
- Awarded Date
- 2013. 2
- Type
- Dissertation
- Publisher
- 부경대학교
- URI
- https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/24952
http://pknu.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000001966331
- Alternative Author(s)
- Song, Jae Eun
- Affiliation
- 부경대학교 대학원
- Department
- 대학원 경영학과
- Advisor
- 김영조
- Table Of Contents
- Ⅰ. 서 론·····························································1
1. 연구의 필요성 및 연구 목적··········································11
2. 연구의 범위 및 구성···················································35
Ⅱ. 연구모형 및 연구가설도출····································56
1. 기술협력 네트워크······················································56
가. 기술협력 네트워크의 정의··········································5
나. 기술협력 네트워크의 구성요소····································7
(1) 사회자본의 구조적 배태성········································9
(2) 사회자본의 관계적 배태성·······································11
2 흡수능력··································································13
3 기술학습의 전략유형···················································15
4. 기술혁신성과····························································18
Ⅲ. 연구방법························································21
1. 변수의 조작적 정의 및 측정·········································21
가. 기술협력 네트워크···················································21
나. 흡수능력·······························································23
다. 기술학습의 전략유형················································23
라. 기술혁신성과·························································24
마. 통제변수·······························································24
2. 자료의 수집 및 분석 방법············································25
가. 조사설계 및 자료수집··············································25
나. 설문지의 구성·······················································25
다. 분석방법·····························································26
Ⅳ. 실증분석························································26
1. 표본의 특성·····························································26
2. 타당성 및 신뢰성 분석················································31
3. 변수간 상관관계························································33
4. 가설검증 결과···························································35
가. 기술협력 네트워크와 기술혁신성과에 대한 가설검증·········37
나. 흡수능력과 기술혁신성과에 대한 가설검증·····················38
다. 기술학습 전략유형의 조절효과에 대한 가설검증··············39
라. 기술혁신 성과의 집단(고/저)에 대한 판별분석················43
Ⅴ. 결 론···························································45
1. 연구결과의 요약························································45
2. 시사점 및 한계점·······················································46
가. 시사점··································································46
나. 연구의 한계 및 향후 연구과제····································47
참고문헌·······································································48
설문지········································································55
Abstract·····································································60
- Degree
- Master
-
Appears in Collections:
- 대학원 > 경영학과
- Authorize & License
-
- Files in This Item:
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.