부산지역 해양관광 발전을 위한 해양스포츠 활성화방안 연구
- Abstract
- Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze marine sports activities’ hindrance factor, attractive attribute, satisfaction and revitalization, and to suggest the revitalization of marine sports for development of marine tourism in Busan. For this, it has been conducting survey to 350 people who participated in marine sports in Busan from October 2012 to April 2013.
According to SPSS/PC+Win. 15.0 as data processing, it is conducted an analysis of frequency on research participants’ general characteristic and using pattern, and conducted verifying confidence to verify measurement tool’s reliability. Furthermore, it is also conducted T-Test and One-Way ANOVA to verify difference between hindrance factors, attractive attribute, satisfaction and revitalization and Duncan law for post-hoc comparison.
The major research results through these analyzing processes were same as followings.
First of all, the difference of hindrance factors in terms of gender is “lack of awareness about marine sports” and “lack of programs for marine sports activities”, and the difference of attractive attribute in terms of gender is “where the weather is superior”, “superb natural landscape such as sea and mountain”, “the place is convenient to get close to coordinate tourist attraction”, “the place where people are kind” and “the place is good for shopping to be adjacent to major city”. Furthermore, the difference of satisfaction in terms of gender is “revisitation for participating in marine sports”, and the significance difference of revitalization in terms of gender is “need for marketing and information for marine sports activities”.
Second of all, the difference of hindrance factors in terms of field is “a high cost to participate in marine sports including renting equipment”, “lack of equipment that allows people to participate in marine sports”, “marine sports is time-consuming activity” and “marine sports activity is unsafe”, and the difference of attractive attribute in terms of field is “superb natural landscape such as sea and mountain”, “the place where is able to enjoy hot-spring”, “convenient place to tour other areas” and “the place is well-equipped such as accommodation, food, transport and other facilities”. As well as, the difference of satisfaction in terms of field is “the satisfaction of program towards participating in marine sports”, and the significance difference of revitalization in terms of field is “need to strengthen accessibility for enjoying marine sports”, “need to promote excellent leader in marine sports” and “need for marketing and information for marine sports activities”.
Third of all, the differences of hindrance factors in terms of career is “a high cost to participate in marine sports including renting equipment”, “lack of facilities that allow people to participate in marine sports” and “the awareness of a high cost in marine sports”. As well as, the differences of attractive attribute in terms of career is “where the weather is superior”, “superb natural landscape such as sea and mountain” and “the place conveniently situated with major city”. Finally, the difference of satisfaction in terms of career is “the satisfaction of program towards participating in marine sports” and “revisitation for participating in marine sports”, and there are significant differences in all sub factors of revitalization in terms of career.
Fourth of all, the difference of hindrance factors in terms of number of times is “a high cost to participate in marine sports including renting equipment”, “lack of facilities that allows people to participate in marine sports” and “a brief span of doing marine sports activities”, and the difference of attractive attribute in terms of number of times is “where the weather is superior”, “the place where is able to be possible to do experience in natural such as ocean and mountain activities” and “superb natural landscape such as sea and mountain”. Finally, the difference of satisfaction in terms of number of times is “the satisfaction of program towards participating in marine sports”, “after participating in marine sports, satisfaction about accommodation” and “revisitation for participating in marine sports”, and there are significant differences in all sub factors of revitalization in terms of number of times.
Finally, the difference of hindrance factors in terms of time of participation in one day is “marine sports activity is unsafe” and “the awareness of a high cost in marine sports”, and the difference of attractive attribute in terms of time of participation in one day is “where the weather is superior” and “the place where is able to be possible to do experience in natural such as ocean and mountain activities”. As well as, the difference of satisfaction in terms of time of participation in one day is “satisfaction about kindness of people when participating in marine sports” and “revisitation for participating in marine sports”. Finally, the significance difference of revitalization in terms of time of participation in one day is “need for revitalization in marine sports such as promoting marine sports equipment store”, need for development of various marine sports programs and events in relation to marine sports”, “need to strengthen accessibility for enjoying marine sports”, “need to promote excellent leader in marine sports”, “need for marketing and information for marine sports activities” and “need for operation of marine sports training program”.
- Author(s)
- 김건우
- Issued Date
- 2013
- Awarded Date
- 2013. 8
- Type
- Dissertation
- Publisher
- 부경대학교
- URI
- https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/25496
http://pknu.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000001966569
- Affiliation
- 대학원
- Department
- 대학원 체육학과
- Advisor
- 지삼업
- Table Of Contents
- 목 차
Ⅰ 서론 1
1. 연구의 필요성 1
2. 연구의 목적 4
3. 연구문제 4
4. 연구의 제한점 5
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 6
1. 해양관광 6
1) 해양관광의 개념 및 정의 6
2) 해양관광의 분류 13
3) 해양관광의 특성 17
4) 해양관광의 동향과 전망 21
2. 해양스포츠 24
1) 해양스포츠의 개념 24
2) 해양스포츠의 분류 24
3. 부산의 해양관광 30
1) 부산의 해양관광 참여인구 전망 30
2) 부산의 해양관광자원 30
3) 부산의 해양관광 발전 잠재력 31
4) 부산의 해양관광의 문제점 32
Ⅲ. 연구방법 33
1. 연구대상 33
2. 조사도구 36
3. 자료처리방법 42
Ⅳ. 연구 결과 43
1. 성별에 따른 저해요인, 매력속성, 만족도, 활성화방안의 차이 43
2. 분야에 따른 저해요인, 매력속성, 만족도, 활성화방안의 차이 49
3. 경력에 따른 저해요인, 매력속성, 만족도, 활성화방안의 차이 55
4. 횟수에 따른 저해요인, 매력속성, 만족도, 활성화방안의 차이 61
5. 1일 참여시간에 따른 저해요인, 매력속성, 만족도, 활성화방안의 차이 66
Ⅴ. 논의 71
1. 성별에 따른 저해요인, 매력속성, 만족도, 활성화방안의 차이 71
2. 분야에 따른 저해요인, 매력속성, 만족도, 활성화방안의 차이 73
3. 경력에 따른 저해요인, 매력속성, 만족도, 활성화방안의 차이 77
4. 횟수에 따른 저해요인, 매력속성, 만족도, 활성화방안의 차이 80
5. 1일 참여시간에 따른 저해요인, 매력속성, 만족도, 활성화방안의 차이 82
Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 88
1. 결론 88
2. 제언 90
참고문헌 91
부 록 96
- Degree
- Master
-
Appears in Collections:
- 대학원 > 체육학과
- Authorize & License
-
- Files in This Item:
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.