일본어 동사의 사역과의 관계

Abstract

The relationship of a causativity between japanese verbs

Kong, Mi-Hee

Department of Language and Literature of Japanese, The Graduate School, Pukyong National University

Abstract

This study is about the relationship between the causative of Japanese verbs, which was analyzed separately and respectively into five chapters. In the first chapter, an analysis of the relationship between transitivity and causative of the “intransitive (sa) seru” form is shown. It states a classification reference point based on the semantic property of transitivity and causative and the meaning of the intransitive (sa) seru is not extremes of transitivity and causative but a continuity in a single line on it. It was proved by a process of intermediate stages in accordance with the varying degrees of transitivity and causative properties. In the second chapter, in relation to being the causative of transitive, one of the transitive verb morphemes ｢-as-｣, ｢-os-｣, ｢-s-｣, ｢-se-｣ is represented as the continuity in aspects of morphological and (sa) seru of the causative morpheme. Then in this sense, if the intention and activity of the subject to target are direct, they may represent the meaning of typical transitivity. Even the intention and activity of the subject to the target have if it is direct or indirect, and it gives instruction or command to the target by the intention of the subject, outreaches indirect, etc., and setting the classification of ranging the meaning of the causative typical situation is realized by the will and the activity of the target it could be. In the third chapter, there has been analyzed for syntactic features, meaning of recursive causative sentence. Verb is used to state adverbially syntax in the dependent clause「〜V1させたまま」「〜V1させて」「〜V1させながら」「〜V1させ」 was found that the meanings or Operating of parallel and state. As a semantic character, 1) there is activity and intention in GA case 2) but there is intention of no activity GA case 3) there is no intention and only the activity GA case 4) there is no intention and no activity GA case. I had a look at the features of semantic recursion causative sentence, categorized into four for example. In the fourth chapter, when the verb (sa) seru shape represents the meaning of the causative, intermediate meaning of transitivity and causative, the meaning of the transitivity, it also forms a continuity with each other. transitive and intransitive forms a continuity through reflexive use. it forms a continuity on the whole and activity continuation, result continuation = stative Perfect, actional perfect, and simply state in semantic characteristic aspect te-iru, that it forms a continuity through the stage was. In the fifth chapter, the basic meaning in the causative passive sentence is that when you feel the damage and sense of force reluctantly, actor is acting on by some influence or instruction of causative subject. However, there is not just this sense of causative passive sentence, and the meaning of the causative passive sentence changed behavior mainly by how it is influenced from causative primarily, of the verb in the causative sentence the basic fundamental I based on the characteristics of semantic (sa) seru form.