PUKYONG

해양수산 기업의 ESG 기업성과 분석

Metadata Downloads
Alternative Title
Ocean and Fisheries ESG Performance Analysis
Abstract
Recent calls for corporate sustainability and social responsibility have
highlighted the significance of non-financial information, as well as financial
information. Non-financial information is referred to as ESG, which stands
for environment, society, and governance. There is a growing debate
regarding whether companies should be mandated to disclose ESG
information.
Incorporating ESG management as part of the new capitalist order has
prompted the establishment of institutional foundations that promote
companies to adopt ESG management practices, thereby enhancing financial
performance and fostering social welfare. In the past, companies were
evaluated based on financial quantitative indicators. However, due to the
increasing impact of companies on society, non-financial indicators such as
environment (climate change, carbon border tax, etc.), society (working
environment, occupational safety and health, unfair practices, etc.), and
governance (management transparency, morality, etc.) have become
important measures for evaluating companies.
From a theoretical perspective, expanding ESG disclosure primarily aims
to enhance the corporate value. The dissemination of ESG data positively
influences investors, certainty by providing adequate and timely information,
ultimately leading to an increase in corporate value. (Oh Deokgyo, 2021).
ESG management activities have a short-term negative impact on
corporate value due to increased costs. However, these actions have a
long-term positive impact on corporate value because of consumers'
preferences for companies that achieve ESG management goals and improve
the company's ability to respond to environmental regulations (Min et al.
2015;, Park et al., 2022) Despite being non-financial, ESG evaluation
information is critical for empirical analysis as it is causally related and can
provide useful accounting information. While most industries benefit from
positive relationships between ESG factors and corporate performance,
marine fisheries indicate insignificant industry-specific effects with positive
impact on corporate value.
There is a lack of policy guidance obtained through ESG assessment for
marine and fisheries listed enterprises, and comprehensive analyses that are
based on the specialized classification system for marine and fisheries are
insufficient. Therefore, analyzing the current ESG assessments and financial
performance of the listed companies in the marine and fisheries sector
through empirical research indicates the significance of creating data based
on evidence and deriving ESG policy directions for this industry.
Author(s)
김태한
Issued Date
2024
Awarded Date
2024-02
Type
Dissertation
Publisher
국립부경대학교 대학원
URI
https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/33820
http://pknu.dcollection.net/common/orgView/200000745210
Alternative Author(s)
KIM TAEHAN
Affiliation
국립부경대학교 대학원
Department
대학원 과학기술정책학과
Advisor
이민규
Table Of Contents
Ⅰ. 서 론 1
1. 연구의 배경과 필요성 1
2. 연구의 목적 2
3. 연구의 범위 3
4. 연구의 방법 및 구성 3
Ⅱ. ESG의 제도적 배경 및 규제 현황 6
1. ESG 이론 · 6
2. 해외 ESG 동향 · 16
3. 국내 ESG 동향 · 20
4. ESG 기업 사례 · 23
1) 파타고니아(제조업) · 23
2) 유니레버(제조업) 24
3) 페덱스(물류업) 25
4) SK이노베이션(제조업) · 26
5) 동원산업(수산업) 26
6) 동원 F&B(수산업) 27
7) 풀무원(음식료품) 28
8) 현대중공업, 대우조선해양, 삼성중공업(조선기자재) 29
Ⅲ. 국내외 ESG 평가체계 · 30
1. 해외 주요 ESG 정보공시 · 30
1) 국제지속가능성기준위원회(ISSB) 30
2) ESRS(European Sustainability Reporting Standards) · 33
3) 미국 SEC(증권거래위원회) 기후법안 34
2. 국내 ESG 평가기관별 평가체계 · 37
1) 한국ESG기준원 37
2) 국민연금기금 45
3) 한국ESG연구소(KRESG) 49
4) 서스틴베스트 54
3. 소결 59
Ⅳ. 선행연구 고찰 · 61
1. ESG 평가와 장기 기업 성과의 관계 61
2. ESG 평가와 단기 기업 성과의 관계 66
3. 선행연구와의 차별성 73
Ⅴ. 해양수산업 ESG 기업 패널 분석 75
1. 패널데이터 회귀모형 75
2. 연구모형 설정 76
3. 표본선정과 변수선정 77
4. 산업별 T-test 분석 결과 · 87
1) 전 상장기업과 해양수산업 87
2) 수산업과 농림어업 88
3) 조선기자재업과 제조업 88
4) 해운물류업과 운수 및 창고업 89
5. 패널데이터 회귀모형 분석 결과 · 90
1) 전 상장기업(597개사) 90
2) 해양수산 상장기업(30개) 94
3) 수산업 97
4) 농림어업 100
5) 조선기자재 103
6) 제조업 · 106
7) 해운물류업 109
8) 운수 및 창고업 112
6. 소결 · 115
Ⅵ. 결 론 · 119
1. 연구 요약 119
2. 학술적 시사점 · 121
3. 정책적 시사점 122
1) 해양수산업과 전 사업 분석에 따른 시사점 · 122
2) 수산업 농림어업 분석에 따른 시사점 123
3) 조선기자재와 제조업 분석에 따른 시사점 124
4) 해운물류업와 운수 및 창고업 분석에 따른 시사점 124
4. 연구의 한계 및 향후 과제 127
참고 문헌 130
1. 국내 문헌 130
2. 해외 문헌 134
3. 웹사이트 검색 · 137
Degree
Doctor
Appears in Collections:
대학원 > 과학기술정책학과
Authorize & License
  • Authorize공개
  • Embargo2024-02-16
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.