취학 전 아동의 유아체육프로그램이 신체 발육, 발달 및 체지방량에 미치는 영향

Abstract

The research which it sees 5times a week, Infantile physical fitness group which execute a motion with systematic and complex infantile physical education program and do not execute a motion entirely infant in the object for 20 weeks. Comparatively analyzes body growth, physical advancement, body fat, there is a from babyhood , effect after the systematic training prescription and there is a place objective which studies the importance of infantile physical education. The object person of the research dwell in P megalopolis's infant of under 6. Experimental group are 16people (boy : 8 , girl : 8), the S center infant physical fitness grade units executes a systematic infant physical training program. Comparison group are 16people (boy : 8 , girl : 8), the S center infant physical fitness grade units doesn't executes a systematic infant physical training program. The effect of pre-school children's the infant physical training program on the body growth, physical advancement and body fat. Body growth's measurement item is standing height, body weight, girth of chest, sitting height, length of arm, length of leg. Physical advancement's measurement item is Examination of physical strength: back strength, sit-up test, standing long jump, 10m shuttle run, trunk flexion, on foot balance. Body fat's measurement estimate Tricepsbrachil, Scapular lower part's skin fold by formula. The comparison object that does not execute systematic physical activity measure same method. Duration of the infantile physical education program for the test which it sees a semester; 20weeks. Motion frequency is Swim is 3times a week(Monday, Wednesday, Friday), Physical training is 2times a week(Tuesday, Thursday), Taekwondo is 1time a week(Wednesday) and Ballet is 1time a week(Monday). Motion intensity is gradual increase load at 2~4week intervals. Motion hours is the preparatory motion 5 minutes, the motion 35 minutes and the arrangement motin 5 minutes. ; the total 45 minutes. After 20weeks, experimental group and comparison group estimate same method. Because they understands change of before and after in infantile physical education program. The data process used a SPSS/ Ver 10.0 program and it produced an average and a standard deviation in technical statistical analysis. Comparison in group put into effect unified arrangement analysis of dispersion. Comparison of measurement time have done Scheff's method of post censorship. The comparison of between infantile physical fitness grade unit group and general kindergartener group calculate t-examination, statistial significant level set up p< .05. The conclusion obtained from this study were as follows; 1. Change of Body growth 1) The change of before and after in program of standing height both experimental group(p< .001) and comparison group(p< .001) has enhanced significantly. They had significative difference(p< .01) 2) The change of before and after in program of body weight comparison group hasn't enhanced significantly, experimental group(p< .001) has enhanced significantly. but They had no significative difference. 3) The change of before and after in program of girth of chest both comparison group(p< .05) and experimental group(p< .05) has enhanced significantly. but They had no significative difference. 4) The change of before and after in program of sitting height both comparison group and experimental group hasn't been enhanced significantly. and They had no significative difference. 5) The change of before and after in program of length of arm both experimental group(p< .001) and comparison group(p< .001) has been enhanced significantly. and They were enhanced significantly(p< .05) 6) The change of before and after in program of length of leg comparison group hasn't enhanced significantly, experimental group(p< .01) has enhanced significantly. but They had no significative difference. 2. Change of physical advancement 1) The change of before and after in program of back strength both comparison group and experimental group hasn't been enhanced significantly. They weren't enhanced significantly. 2) The change of before and after in program of sit-up test both experimental group(p< .01) and comparison group(p< .01) has been enhanced significantly. They were enhanced significantly.(p< .01) 3) The change of before and after in program of stand long jump both experimental group(p< .001) and comparison group(p< .01) has been enhanced significantly. They were enhanced significantly.(p< .001) 4) The change of before and after in program of 10m shuttle run comparison group hasn't enhanced significantly, experimental group(p< .01) has enhanced significantly. but They had no significative difference. 5) The change of before and after in program of trunk flexion both experimental group(p< .001) and comparison group(p< .05) has been enhanced significantly. They were enhanced significantly.(p< .001) 6) The change of before and after in program of one foot balance both experimental group(p< .001) and comparison group(p< .001) has been enhanced significantly. but They had no significative difference. 3.Change of body fat The change of before and after in program of body fat comparison group hasn't enhanced significantly, experimental group(p< .01) has enhanced significantly. They had significative difference(p< .05).