도시환경개선을 위한 디자인 개념의 적용요소에 관한 연구

Abstract

Recently, a new world is expanded depend oninformation engineering and industrial technology development. The industrial area, housing and traffic are also changed. That is made a new environment of city. In nowdays, most of the building designsare for satisfying the people numerical rising. But in the city environment, tall buildings,signboard and some other kinds of publications are making the city into a chaotic state. For this, a lot of companies as named public design work on constantly improve eco-environment. The target of design is for improving the cognition of citizens, find the value of the city environment and find out the problem. But it always has difficult process for reach the target.

In this thesis the research result is shown like next contant. 1) In human activities convenient means convenient side; the keep ecological status means natural side; each of person’s communication means communicate side; artistic appreciation and aesthetic appreciation means culture side. 2) For the Psychological factor of city environment design continuity, environmental, ecology, andplacenessismoreimportantthansafety,accessibility,diversity,reconcilability,openness,aesthetic,symbolic,cognitiveandinherencyincityplanning. 3) For the Psychological factor of city environment design continuity, ecology, unity, diversity, openness, aesthetic and symbolic is more important than safety, accessibility, continuity, environmental, reconcilability, placeness, cognitive and inherency in local area planning. For the Psychological factor of city environment design accessibility, continuity, ecology, diversity, openness and symbolic is more important than safety, functional, environmental, unity, reconcilability, aesthetic, placeness, cognitive and inherency in building planning. For the Psychological factor of city environment design accessibility, continuity, ecology, diversity, openness and symbolic is more important than safety, functional, environmental, unity, reconcilability, aesthetic, placeness, cognitive and inherency in building planning. 3) Following the scale changing of city planning, local area planning, building planning, importance of continuity, ecology, placeness and inherency is lower than openness, symbolic and accessibility. In the local area planning, the importance of environmental, functional, reconcilability and safety is lower than diversity, aesthetic, unity.