유니버설디자인 교육에서 트리즈를 활용한 제품디자인 수업 개발 연구 : 디자인 전문계 고등학교를 중심으로
- Abstract
- Most technical design high schools now a days implement the functional cramming method of teaching, such as theories, programs, and drawings. The youth period, which is a platform that forms thinking and values, requires fundamental designer education based on formation of affective values and creativity, rather than skill acquisition.
The research, therefore, aims to realize care and equality –the affective value that forms the values of human dignity on the theme of Universal Design, handled by general design education; also to internalize meaning through user perspective experience through application of the concept of Universal Design to product design teaching; whereby design class plans to deduce a variety of creative idea thinking methods through a systematic process using 'TRIZ', a theory of creative problem solving in the design process.
The paper conducted the following research to accomplish the goal:
First, the study is intended to form values for ‘sense of community’, ‘equality and respect for humans’as members of society and 'caring' that considers a third-party perspective through 'Universal Design' concept classes that can be utilized by members of society.
Second, the paper designed an idea thinking model suitable for the universal product design class in conjunction with an idea thinking process and TRIZ in order to apply the TRIZ theory to a product design class, and suggested a teaching process via the process of a model.
Third, we discovered problems in various user perspectives through the experience of existing products that we can see from everyday life, and applied 'TRIZ', a theory of creative problem solving for idea thinking of Universal Design.
Fourth, we utilized the ‘40 types of invention principles' of the TRIZ problem solving principles in the stage of idea thinking and by applying 14 types of principles selected among the 40 types through frequency analysis based on ‘100 Universal Designs’, we were able to design creative thinking training that enables multi-perspective problem solving free of solving fragmentary thinking.
Fifth, the study designed and divided a teaching plan into four sessions for 11th graders of the design department of a technical high school.
With the combination of the theory of scientific-problem solving and design process, we formulated a new-product design program that deviates from existing methods; by suggesting a teaching proposal for deducing spontaneous and various ideas through a systematic thinking program, rather than vague imagination, we believe the program could improve students' range of thinking skills and diversify their viewpoints. If the teaching program developed through the research is applied to actual teaching, we believe it could provide an opportunity, which improves teaching both professionally and qualitatively for students majoring in design.
- Author(s)
- 이보배
- Issued Date
- 2012
- Awarded Date
- 2012. 2
- Type
- Dissertation
- Publisher
- 부경대학교
- URI
- https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/9103
http://pknu.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000001965910
- Department
- 교육대학원 디자인교육전공
- Advisor
- 유상욱
- Table Of Contents
- 표목차.....................................................................................................................................ⅳ
그림목차.................................................................................................................................ⅵ
Abstract................................................................................................................................ⅷ
Ⅰ. 서론.......................................................................................................................1
1. 연구 배경과 목적.............................................................................................1
2. 연구내용 및 방법.............................................................................................4
3. 연구의 제한점 .................................................................................................5
Ⅱ. 유니버설디자인(Universal Design)의 이론적 고찰............................6
1. 유니버설디자인의 개념...................................................................................6
가. 유니버설디자인의 정의.............................................................................6
나. 유니버설디자인의 원리와 원칙............................................................10
2. 유니버설디자인의 적용사례........................................................................13
가. 제품디자인 사례.......................................................................................13
나. 환경(공공시설) 디자인 사례.................................................................15
다. 시각디자인 사례.......................................................................................16
라. 포장디자인 사례.......................................................................................17
3. 국내 유니버설디자인 현황..........................................................................18
가. 유니버설 디자인 공모전 및 행사........................................................18
4. 디자인 전문계 고등학교에서 유니버설디자인 교육의 필요성........................22
Ⅲ. 트리즈(Triz)의 이론적 고찰......................................................................27
1. 트리즈의 개념.................................................................................................27
2. 트리즈의 원리와 구성...................................................................................28
3. 트리즈 이론의 적용사례...............................................................................38
4. 트리즈와 창의적 아이디어 발상 교육......................................................42
가. 트리즈의 아이디어 발상........................................................................42
나. 트리즈를 활용한 창의성 교육에 관한 선행 논문...........................42
5. 제품디자인 수업에서 창의적 발상교육의 필요성.................................44
Ⅳ. 유니버설디자인에서 트리즈를 활용한 제품디자인 교육 방안
연구....................................................................................................................48
1. 전문계 고등학교에서 유니버설디자인 교육 현황.................................49
가. 디자인 교과목 개설 현황 및 학교 현황............................................49
나. 유니버설디자인 교과내용 분석............................................................52
2. 유니버설디자인 수업 실태조사..................................................................55
가. 설문조사 개요...........................................................................................55
나. 설문조사 내용 및 분석..........................................................................56
3. 유니버설디자인의 개념 지도 방안...........................................................65
4. 유니버설디자인 수업에서 트리즈의 적용 방안.....................................69
가. 유니버설디자인 수업에서 트리즈 적용 범위와 사례분석.............69
나. 트리즈를 적용한 아이디어 발상 프로세스 모형 개발...................80
다. 유니버설디자인에서 트리즈 적용 방안..............................................82
Ⅴ. 유니버설디자인에서 트리즈를 활용한 제품디자인 발상 프로그램 제안....................................................................................................................94
1. 수업 설정 배경 및 이유...............................................................................94
2. 유니버설디자인에서 트리즈를 활용한 제품디자인 교육프로그램
목표....................................................................................................................95
3. 수업 계획 및 프로그램.................................................................................96
가. 수업지도 계획...........................................................................................96
나. 본시 교수․학습 지도 프로그램 계획................................................97
4. 기대효과.........................................................................................................105
Ⅵ. 결론...................................................................................................................107
참고문헌..................................................................................................................110
부록..........................................................................................................................112
- Degree
- Master
-
Appears in Collections:
- 교육대학원 > 디자인교육전공
- Authorize & License
-
- Files in This Item:
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.