PUKYONG

2007 개정 교육과정에 따른 중학교 영어교과서와 학습활동책의 문법항목과 문법활동 분석

Metadata Downloads
Abstract
An Analysis of Grammar in Middle School
English Textbooks and Activity Books

Yoon, Eun Su

Graduate School of Education
Pukyong National University

ABSTRACT

New middle school English textbooks and activity books have been published, from first to third grade by the revised national curriculum in 2011. However, they have not been analyzed, nor verified to see how effective they are to help students’ learning grammar.
The purpose of this study is to analyze and verify the efficiency of the textbooks and the activity books, focusing on how well and often grammar is presented and how grammar activities are presented, based on second language acquisition theories. According to current second language acquisition theories, grammar is essential to improve students' communication competence. For this research four kinds of text books and activity books were randomly chosen and analyzed in terms of key grammars shown by the national curriculum. The research also examined various kinds of grammar activities: understanding, output, interactions and 4 language skills which were selected by the researcher.
The results of this analysis are as follow: 1. Most of the textbooks presented the language forms by the national curriculum to fit the student’s acquisition level. However, one textbook presented several grammars which are infinitive forms, passive voice, relative forms and indirect questions. 2. Every textbook made an effort to present grammars following the national curriculum guidelines. However, some grammars, for example, it-, adverb 'enough', joining adverb, are hardly presented in the textbooks. Some adverbs and when-, exclamatory sentence are shown in some textbooks only. 3. I made standards which are understanding, output, interaction and 4 skills to examine what type of activities presented to help students learn grammar in the textbooks and activity books. First, as the grades go up, the rate of output of the grammar activities decreases. Textbook C, B respectively presented more output activities than understanding activities. Second, most of the textbooks showed one-way activities. Third, all of the textbooks focused on reading and writing activities to learn grammars and textbook D was the best to show the four skills, listening, speaking, reading, and writing. In the activity books, the rate of understanding activities is higher than output in the four kinds of activity books. Regarding the four skills, all of the activity books shared a lot in terms of reading and writing to learn grammars. Activity book D' was the only one to introduce listening skills. Workbook A' dealt mostly with speaking skills, workbook B' primarily showed integrated skills and workbook D' mostly showed reading skills.
From the results above, I suggest that when the textbooks are revised in the future, the should be related to real English communication. In addition, activity books need to show various grammar activities to satisfy the various student levels. Lastly, multiple activities should be introduced to enhance effectiveness of differentiated learning.
Author(s)
윤은수
Issued Date
2011
Awarded Date
2011. 8
Type
Dissertation
Publisher
부경대학교 교육대학원
URI
https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/9224
http://pknu.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000001965378
Affiliation
교육대학원 영어교육
Department
교육대학원 영어교육전공
Advisor
오준일
Table Of Contents
목 차

ABSTRACT ·················································································ⅶ

Ⅰ. 서 론 ·····················································································1
1.1 연구 목적 및 필요성 ······························································1
1.2 연구 과제 ·············································································3
1.3 연구 구성과 제한점······························································…3

Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 ············································································5
2.1 문법교육의 필요성 ·································································5
2.2 의사소통능력과 문법적 능력에 관한 이론적 변천 …····················6
2.3 교과서와 학습활동책의 의미와 역할 ·······································13
2.4 문법활동의 정의와 유형 ························································16
2.5 선행연구 ·············································································19

Ⅲ. 연구 방법 ·············································································24
3.1 분석대상 ·············································································24
3.2 분석영역 ·············································································25
3.3 분석기준 ·············································································32
3.3.1 문법항목 ·······································································32
3.3.2 문법활동 유형 ································································33
3.4 분석방법 ·············································································42

Ⅳ. 분석결과 및 논의 ··································································44
4.1 문법항목 제시 분석 ······························································44
4.1.1 중학교 1학년 교과서의 문법항목 제시 ·······························44
4.1.2 중학교 2학년 교과서의 문법항목 제시 ·······························45
4.1.3 중학교 3학년 교과서의 문법항목 제시 ·······························47
4.1.4 논의 ·············································································48
4.2 문법항목 빈도 분석 ······························································50
4.2.1 중학교 교과서의 문법항목 빈도 비교 ·····························…50
4.2.2 중학교 1학년 교과서의 문법항목 빈도 비교 ·······················53
4.2.3 중학교 2학년 교과서의 문법항목 빈도 비교 ·······················55
4.2.4 중학교 3학년 교과서의 문법항목 빈도 비교 ·······················57
4.3 문법활동 유형 분석 ······························································59
4.3.1 문법활동 유형에 따른 교과서 분석 ···································60
4.3.2 문법활동 유형에 따른 학습활동책 분석 ·····························68
4.3.3 문법활동 유형에 따른 학습활동책 수준별 분석 ···················73

Ⅳ. 결론 및 제언 ········································································84
5.1 결론 ···················································································84
5.2 제언 ···················································································86

참고문헌 ······················································································88
Degree
Master
Appears in Collections:
교육대학원 > 영어교육전공
Authorize & License
  • Authorize공개
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.