PUKYONG

원어민 대학영어회화 수업에서의 학습자 배경, 정의적 요인, 말하기 성취도 간의 관계에 관한 연구

Metadata Downloads
Alternative Title
On the Relationship Between Background Variables, Affective Factors, and English Speaking Achievement Among Korean University Students
Abstract
Recently, the improvement of communicative competence has increasingly been stressed in Korea's English educational system. Therefore, the number of English conversation classes taught by native-English speaking instructors continues to increase in most Korean universities. However, there have been few studies published on the relationship between the affective factors associated with English conversation classes and English speaking achievement of university students. The affective factors may have a positive or negative influence on the language learning process and a student's proficiency in the target language. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between the affective factors, background variables relating to English, and English speaking achievements among Korean university students.
The study's research questions were as follows: 1) What relationship is there between the learners’ affective factors and background variables relating to English, 2) What relationship is there between the learners' affective factors and speaking achievements, and 3) What relationship is there between the experience variables relating to English and speaking achievements?
The participants in the study were 169 university students enrolled in a sophomore English conversation class. Regarding the questionnaire on the affective factors, it was based on a version of Horwitz(1986)'s FLCAS (Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale) after interviewing six students about their classes. The questionnaire on the affective factors, which were sub-classified into four factors (trait anxiety, anxiety of negative evaluation from professors and peers, test anxiety, and class interest), was given to the participants. The background variables consisted of the starting point of English study, their English self-rating speaking proficiency, their grades from English conversation Ⅲ, and their TOEIC scores. Their English speaking achievements were assessed on oral midterm and final exams in terms of three criteria: pronunciation, fluency, and accuracy. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 12.0. To analyze the research data, frequency analyses, factor analyses, and regression analyses were implemented, and statistical significance was set at 0.05.
Major findings of the study were as follows. First, between the affective factors and the background variables, all the factors except general anxiety were found to be related to English self-rating speaking proficiency. Class interest was affected according to the grades from English conversation Ⅲ. The TOEIC scores were positively correlated with the test anxiety and class interest. However, the starting point of English study did not show significant correlation on the affective factors.
Second, class interest, among the affective factors, was the only one positively correlated with all English speaking achievements on the total scores, oral mid-term and final exam. However, the other anxiety factors did not have significant influence in all of the criteria of English speaking achievements.
Third, between the background variables and English speaking achievements, their grades from English conversation Ⅲ, and their TOEIC scores were positively correlated with learners’ achievements on the total scores, oral mid-term and final exam. The starting point of English study was positively correlated with English speaking achievements on the total scores and oral mid-term exam. However, English self-rating speaking proficiency did not show significant correlation on English speaking achievements.
The implication of this research for English education is that English learners and instructors should be aware of affective factors like anxiety, class interest and other potential interferences in the language classroom. In conclusion, the affective factors are positively or negatively correlated with language learning processes and achievements. Therefore, native instructors should make classes as interesting as possible, using a variety of amusing and educational activities and methods. Also they should design classroom procedures and activities in a way that will contribute to improving the learners’ speaking achievements and create a positive learning environment in the English classroom.
Author(s)
박지영
Issued Date
2011
Awarded Date
2011. 8
Type
Dissertation
Keyword
원어민
Publisher
부경대학교
URI
https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/9419
http://pknu.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000001965308
Alternative Author(s)
Jiyoung Park
Affiliation
부경대학교
Department
대학원 영어영문학과
Advisor
오준일
Table Of Contents
Ⅰ. 서론 1
1.1 연구의 필요성 1
1.2 연구의 목적과 범위 6
1.3 연구의 제한점 7
1.4 논문의 구성 8
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 10
2.1 영어 말하기 10
2.1.1 영어 말하기 능력 10
2.1.2 영어 말하기 발달 이론 15
2.1.2.1 정의적 여과설 15
2.1.2.2 정보처리 이론 16
2.1.2.3 사회문화 이론 18
2.1.3 원어민 수업의 효과 20
2.1.3.1 원어민 수업의 긍정적 효과 20
2.1.3.2 원어민 수업의 부정적 효과 21
2.1.3.3 정의적 영역에서의 효과 22
2.1.3.4 인지적 영역에서의 효과 23
2.2 정의적 요인: 불안과 흥미도 24
2.2.1 정의적 요인의 정의 및 특징 25
2.2.2 정의적 요인의 발생원인 35
2.2.3 정의적 요인의 역할 37
2.2.4 정의적 요인 및 학습자 배경과 학업 성취도와의 관계 39
Ⅲ. 연구 방법 51
3.1 연구 대상 51
3.2 연구 도구 55
3.2.1 설문지 55
3.2.2 영어 말하기 성취도 평가지 62
3.2.3 면담 자료 66
3.3 자료수집 절차 66
3.3.1 정의적 요인 설문 및 배경 설문 조사 66
3.3.2 영어 말하기 성취도 평가 70
3.3.3 면담 조사 71
3.4 자료분석 방법 72
Ⅳ. 결과 분석 및 논의 74
4.1 정의적 요인과 배경변수와의 관계 74
4.1.1 정의적 요인 74
4.1.2 정의적 요인과 배경변수 77
4.2 정의적 요인과 말하기 성취도와의 관계 90
4.3 배경변수와 말하기 성취도와의 관계 97
4.4 면담조사 분석 109
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 117
5.1 연구 과제별 결론 117
5.1.1 연구 과제 1의 결과 117
5.1.2 연구 과제 2의 결과 118
5.1.3 연구 과제 3의 결과 119
5.2 교육적 함의 및 제언 120
참고 문헌 124
부 록 138
1. 정의적 요인 예비 설문지 138
2. 설문지 140
3. 영어 말하기 성취도 평가지 142
4. 말하기 성취도 채점 기준 143
5. 말하기 성취도 중간고사 질문 유형 144
6. 말하기 성취도 기말고사 질문 유형 146
Degree
Doctor
Appears in Collections:
대학원 > 영어영문학과
Authorize & License
  • Authorize공개
Files in This Item:

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.