Partnering in Construction: The Views and Experiences of Foreign and Local Participants in Vietnamese Market
- Abstract
- Traditional procurement methods have revealed many disadvantages especially the adversarial relationship between parties. After several decades of application, partnering has shown that it is an innovative arrangement that help to reduce many problems having existed in traditional arrangement. It can provide a win-win working attitude in a construction project. This mechanism can help both local and foreign construction participants to mutually offset their differences when implementing projects.
Partnering in construction has been applied in several ways in recent years in Vietnam. Complying with the global integration, the Vietnamese construction industry has faced many new challenges such as increased competition from foreign sector, more exacting quality standards, rapid development of new technologies and increased risks of globalization. The adversarial relationships between project parties from the traditional contract arrangement have caused many difficulties. The construction firms are trying to improve the competency and competitive advantages. They are searching for a new arrangement sufficient with their current context.
There are three major distinct objectives which are the three aspects of partnering implementation in this study. The first objective is to identify and investigate the incentives of partnering application. The second is to identify and examine the problems in implementing partnering approach. Exploring the critical success factors for construction partnering in Vietnam is the last objective in this study. Foreign and local sectors are the two concerned subjects in the study.
The study has investigated and introduced the incentives of partnering from Vietnam perspective. It has been shown that to learn mutually among participants and to increase bidding advantages are the most important incentives according to foreign and local practitioners respectively. In addition, the four perspectives of incentives are examined. Brand and competition perspective is considered as most important while performance improvement perspective is considered as least essential with respect to two sectors. Learning and growth perspective and financial perspective are the two perspectives having divergent opinions between foreign and local participants. Foreign participants pay more attention to learning and growth than to financial side.
The study has identified some prominent problematic issues of partnering in Vietnam construction projects. Partners' attitudes governed by commercial pressure and dealing with large bureaucratic organization(s) are the most concerned problems with foreign organizations and local practitioners respectively. Factor analysis has pointed out seven underlying dimensions of problems existing in partnering process. These are: unsuitability of partnering application; lack of commitment to partnering; unfamiliarity with partnering concept; poor communication between partners; lack of key stakeholders’ involvement; external constraint issues; and disagree to compromise.
Twenty eight success factors are identified in Vietnamese context. The top five success factors in Vietnamese context are: financial security, commitment from top management, mutual trust between parties, adequate resources, and effective communication. Furthermore, factor analysis shows that there are eight underlying dimensions that must be adequately considered to improve the partnering performance in Vietnam. The eight dimensions are: dedication, readiness, coordination, teamwork, sufficiency, leading, balance, and clearness. The dimensions cover all aspects of the partnering working environment.
The subjective answers of respondents on the ten-point scale about partnering success level show a positive trend of performance. The present positive outcomes encourage the practitioners to widely take advantage of this innovative arrangement.
Four components, dedication, teamwork, sufficiency, and balance, are observed to have significant influence on the success level of construction partnering using multinomial logistic regression analysis. It is shown that the extent of contribution varies with success level. A cross-validation technique, namely discriminant analysis, also shows the four similar components significantly influence on the partnering success level. Moreover a logistic regression model is developed to convert qualitative performance of related success factors into quantitative value of chance of partnering success in a specific context. The model can also be used to measure the performance of partnering and to enhance the performance through identifying the impact of significant factors.
- Author(s)
- Le Hoai Long
- Issued Date
- 2010
- Awarded Date
- 2010. 2
- Type
- Dissertation
- Publisher
- 부경대학교
- URI
- https://repository.pknu.ac.kr:8443/handle/2021.oak/9970
http://pknu.dcollection.net/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000001955728
- Department
- 대학원 건설관리공학협동과정
- Advisor
- 이영대
- Table Of Contents
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT v
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF TABLES xii
LIST OF FIGURES xvi
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Characteristics of the construction industry in Vietnam 5
1.3 Partnering definition 8
1.4 Partnering in construction 9
1.5 Research objectives 12
1.6 Structure of this thesis 15
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction 18
2.2 Incentives of partnering approach 19
2.3 Problems in implementing partnering arrangement 23
2.4 Success factor for construction partnering 27
2.5 Chapter conclusion 31
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction 32
3.2 Questionnaire survey 33
3.3 Analysis tools and techniques 40
3.3.1 Descriptive analysis 40
3.3.2 Ranking 41
3.3.3 Spearman ranking correlation test (Spearman rho) 42
3.3.4 Kendall’s coefficient of concordance 43
3.3.5 Test of difference of mean ratings between two groups 44
3.3.6 Factor analysis 45
3.3.7 Multinomial logistic regression analysis 46
3.3.8 Discriminant analysis 50
3.3.9 Summary of employed statistical tools and techniques 51
CHAPTER 4: INCENTIVES OF PARTNERING APPROACH IN CONSTRUCTION
4.1 Introduction 52
4.2 Data analysis 55
4.2.1 Potential partnering incentives and incentives perspectives in Vietnamese construction 55
4.2.2 Mean score and ranking 56
4.2.3 Test the rating consensus between sectors 63
4.2.4 Ranking groups (perspectives) of incentives 66
4.3 Chapter recommendations 69
4.4 Chapter conclusion 70
CHAPTER 5: PROBLEMS IN IMPLEMENTING PARTNERING ARRANGEMENT
5.1 Introduction 73
5.2 Descriptive analysis 76
5.2.1 Mean score and ranking 76
5.2.2 Test the consensus between two sectors 84
5.3 Factor analysis 87
5.3.1 Factor analysis application 87
5.3.2 Discussion on factor analysis result 94
5.3.2.1 Unsuitability of partnering application 94
5.3.2.2 Lack of commitment to partnering 94
5.3.2.3 Unfamiliarity with partnering concept 95
5.3.2.4 Poor communication between partners 95
5.3.2.5 Lack of key stakeholders’ involvement 96
5.3.2.6 External constraint issues 96
5.3.2.7 Failure to compromise 97
5.4 Chapter recommendations 97
5.5 Chapter conclusion 99
CHAPTER 6: SUCCESS FACTORS FOR CONSTRUCTION PARTNERING
6.1 Introduction 102
6.2 Descriptive analysis 105
6.2.1 Mean score and ranking 105
6.2.2 Test the consensus between two sectors 117
6.3 Factor analysis 120
6.3.1 Factor analysis application 120
6.3.2 Discussion on factor analysis result 129
6.3.2.1 Dedication 129
6.3.2.2 Readiness 130
6.3.2.3 Coordination 131
6.3.2.4 Teamwork 132
6.3.2.5 Sufficiency 132
6.3.2.6 Leading 133
6.3.2.7 Balance 134
6.3.2.8 Clearness 135
6.4 Level of partnering success 135
6.5 Modelling the affection of success factors to partnering success 141
6.5.1 Developing multinomial logistic regression model 142
6.5.1.1 Developing model 142
6.5.1.2 Model validation 150
6.5.2 Discriminant analysis as a cross-compared classification rate technique 152
6.5.2.1 Discriminant model development 152
6.5.2.2 Model testing 157
6.5.3 Discussion on modeling results 159
6.6 Chapter recommendations 160
6.6.1 Recommendations based on factor analysis results 160
6.6.2 Recommendations based on the affection of success factors on success level 164
6.6.3 Recommendations for using logistic regression model 166
6.7 Chapter conclusion 166
CHAPTER 7: CONCLUSIONS
7.1 General conclusion 169
7.2 Incentives of partnering application 171
7.3 Problems in implementing partnering in Vietnam 172
7.4 Success factors of partnering implementation in Vietnam 174
7.5 Limitations and future researches 176
7.6 Recommendation for advancing partnering concept application 177
REFERENCE 179
APPENDIX
Appendix 1 Instruction for using logistic regression model 194
Appendix 2 Questionnaire 199
CURRICULUM VITAE 205
- Degree
- Doctor
-
Appears in Collections:
- 대학원 > 건설관리공학협동과정
- Authorize & License
-
- Files in This Item:
-
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.